up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126015402020

Appellant / Complainant

Pran Nath Shukla

VS

Respondent

Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority

Disputed Amount

20,21,260

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestPromotional Misrepresentation

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

32 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015402020 by Pran Nath Shukla against Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestPromotional Misrepresentation
2
Stage 123/05/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and ruled that the appellant is entitled to delay interest (MCLR+1%) from 11.02.2014 to 29.03.2019, holding that the execution of a sale deed does not waive a promoter's statutory obligation to pay interest for delayed possession.

3
Stage 222/04/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 23.05.2025.

4
Stage 326/03/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for orders/hearing on 22.04.2025 and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.

5
Stage 403/03/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a final adjournment to the appellant subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000 to be deposited for the legal library, while explicitly clarifying that no further adjournments will be permitted.

6
Stage 506/02/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 03.03.2025 following a request from the appellant's counsel.

7
Stage 608/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day opportunity to file objections to the memo of appeal, warning that failure to do so will result in the case proceeding ex parte.

8
Stage 727/11/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and directed the appellant to file a reply within one week thereafter, while adjourning the hearing to 08.01.2025.

9
Stage 814/09/2022

For Order

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.

10
Stage 930/08/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a power of attorney executed in favor of Mr. Harshit and adjourned the matter to 14.09.2022.

11
Stage 1001/08/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant and directed the parties to appear at the next hearing, scheduling the appeal for 30.08.2022.

12
Stage 1124/05/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted an application for adjournment requested by the respondent and rescheduled the hearing for August 1, 2022.

13
Stage 1220/04/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal noted the respondent's objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal due to the appellant's lack of standing, and scheduled the matter for 24.05.2022 to consider this issue.

14
Stage 1304/03/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the non-appearance of both parties and rescheduled the hearing for 20.04.2022.

15
Stage 1421/01/2022

Further Order

No text available.

16
Stage 1503/01/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned an 89-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court relaxations, and directed the Registry to register the miscellaneous case as a regular appeal.

17
Stage 1629/11/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal scheduled the case for January 3, 2022, to address the limitation application and its objections, warning that the application may be disposed of in the absence of counsel.

18
Stage 1715/11/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed on behalf of the respondent and rescheduled the case for hearing on 29.11.2021.

19
Stage 1822/09/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and directed the appellant to serve a copy of the appeal and its annexures to the respondent via email within one week.

20
Stage 1906/09/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted the presence of counsel for both parties and adjourned the matter to 22.09.2021 to allow the Respondent's counsel to obtain necessary instructions from the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority.

21
Stage 2030/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

22
Stage 2105/04/2021

Notice

No text available.

23
Stage 2215/03/2021

For Order

No text available.

24
Stage 2317/02/2021

Notice

No text available.

25
Stage 2408/01/2021

Hearing

No text available.

26
Stage 2518/12/2020

Hearing

No text available.

27
Stage 26Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126015402020-23-05-2025

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and ruled that the appellant is entitled to delay interest (MCLR+1%) from 11.02.2014 to 29.03.2019, holding that the execution of a sale deed does not waive a promoter's statutory obligation to pay interest for delayed possession.

28
Stage 27Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126015402020-08-01-2025

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day opportunity to file objections to the memo of appeal, warning that failure to do so will result in the case proceeding ex parte.

29
Stage 28Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126015402020-03-01-2022

The Tribunal condoned an 89-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court relaxations, and directed the Registry to register the miscellaneous case as a regular appeal.

30
Stage 29Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126015402020-03-03-2025

The Tribunal granted a final adjournment to the appellant subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000 to be deposited for the legal library, while explicitly clarifying that no further adjournments will be permitted.

31
Stage 30Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126015402020-20-04-2022

The Tribunal noted the respondent's objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal due to the appellant's lack of standing, and scheduled the matter for 24.05.2022 to consider this issue.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and ruled that the appellant is entitled to delay interest (MCLR+1%) from 11.02.2014 to 29.03.2019, holding that the execution of a sale deed does not waive a promoter's statutory obligation to pay interest for delayed possession. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1 per cent.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1 per centStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and ruled that the appellant is entitled to delay interest (MCLR+1%) from 11.02.2014 to 29.03.2019, holding that the execution of a sale deed does not waive a promoter's statutory obligation to pay interest for delayed possession.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1 per cent

Interest Period

from 11.02.2014 to 29.03.2019

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 12

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Tanay Hazari

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Sachin Upadhyay
  • Amandeep Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126015402020-23-05-2025

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and ruled that the appellant is entitled to delay interest (MCLR+1%) from 11.02.2014 to 29.03.2019, holding that the execution of a sale deed does not waive a promoter's statutory obligation to pay interest for delayed possession.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126015402020-08-01-2025

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day opportunity to file objections to the memo of appeal, warning that failure to do so will result in the case proceeding ex parte.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126015402020-03-01-2022

The Tribunal condoned an 89-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court relaxations, and directed the Registry to register the miscellaneous case as a regular appeal.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126015402020-03-03-2025

The Tribunal granted a final adjournment to the appellant subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000 to be deposited for the legal library, while explicitly clarifying that no further adjournments will be permitted.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126015402020-20-04-2022

The Tribunal noted the respondent's objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal due to the appellant's lack of standing, and scheduled the matter for 24.05.2022 to consider this issue.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →