Appellant / Complainant
M/S Maa Bhagwati Commercial Reality N Resorts LLP
Respondent
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority
maa bhagwati commercial reality n resorts llp
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015312025 by M/S Maa Bhagwati Commercial Reality N Resorts LLP against Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's rejection of the project registration, ruling that real estate projects can be developed on leasehold land and that the trust was not required to seek court permission under Section 92 CPC for leasing unutilized land.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal has reserved judgment in the appeal filed by M/S Maa Bhagwati Commercial Reality N Resorts LLP and directed both parties to submit written submissions and case law compilations within one week.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's amendment application to supplement the memo of appeal, noting that the strict rigors of the Code of Civil Procedure do not apply to these proceedings.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the respondent a three-day extension to file objections due to counsel's illness and scheduled the hearing for August 14, 2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the respondent, U.P.RERA, one week to file objections and scheduled the next hearing for August 8, 2025.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant two weeks to file an amendment application and scheduled the next hearing for July 25, 2025.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant ten days to file a rejoinder affidavit in response to the respondent's objection and scheduled the appeal for final hearing on 07.07.2025.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the appeal via speed-post and email, while also mandating the Registry to report on whether the appellant must comply with the Section 43(5) mandate.
Tribunal Order #0901126015312025-25-09-2025
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's rejection of the project registration, ruling that real estate projects can be developed on leasehold land and that the trust was not required to seek court permission under Section 92 CPC for leasing unutilized land.
Tribunal Order #0901126015312025-14-08-2025
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's amendment application to supplement the memo of appeal, noting that the strict rigors of the Code of Civil Procedure do not apply to these proceedings.
Tribunal Order #0901126015312025-05-05-2025
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the appeal via speed-post and email, while also mandating the Registry to report on whether the appellant must comply with the Section 43(5) mandate.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's rejection of the project registration, ruling that real estate projects can be developed on leasehold land and that the trust was not required to seek court permission under Section 92 CPC for leasing unutilized land. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's rejection of the project registration, ruling that real estate projects can be developed on leasehold land and that the trust was not required to seek court permission under Section 92 CPC for leasing unutilized land.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Shobhit Mohan Shukla
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's rejection of the project registration, ruling that real estate projects can be developed on leasehold land and that the trust was not required to seek court permission under Section 92 CPC for leasing unutilized land.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's amendment application to supplement the memo of appeal, noting that the strict rigors of the Code of Civil Procedure do not apply to these proceedings.
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the appeal via speed-post and email, while also mandating the Registry to report on whether the appellant must comply with the Section 43(5) mandate.
Need to research all rulings for maa bhagwati commercial reality n resorts llp?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.