up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126015262020

Appellant / Complainant

Ashish Rahi

VS

Respondent

Uppal Chaddha Hitech Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

uppal chaddha hitech developers pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

29 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015262020 by Ashish Rahi against Uppal Chaddha Hitech Developers Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

2
Stage 118/09/2023

Hearing

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and their counsel.

3
Stage 228/07/2023

Hearing

No text available.

4
Stage 317/05/2023

Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 410/04/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a bereavement and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 17.05.2023.

6
Stage 503/03/2023

Further Hearing

The Tribunal noted the absence of counsel for both parties and scheduled the case for hearing/orders on 10.04.2023.

7
Stage 601/02/2023

Further Hearing

No text available.

8
Stage 716/12/2022

Further Hearing

The court granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for further orders on 01.02.2023.

9
Stage 821/11/2022

Further Hearing

No text available.

10
Stage 931/10/2022

Re-Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for November 21, 2022.

11
Stage 1023/09/2022

Re-Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the re-hearing of Appeal-88/2020 and scheduled it for a new hearing date on 31.10.2022.

12
Stage 1124/05/2022

Hearing

The court noted the continuous absence of the appellant and reserved the judgment following arguments from the respondent's counsel.

13
Stage 1218/05/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 24.05.2022 because the appellant's senior counsel was unavailable due to a commitment in the High Court.

14
Stage 1312/04/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the appellant for arguments and adjourned the matter to 17.05.2022, noting that failure to appear on the next date will result in the closure of their opportunity to submit submissions.

15
Stage 1421/02/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for April 12, 2022.

16
Stage 1511/01/2022

Further Order

No text available.

17
Stage 1609/12/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 11.01.2022 because the appellant's counsel was out of station and unable to attend the proceedings.

18
Stage 1708/12/2021

Further Order

The matter was adjourned at the request of the respondent's counsel and is scheduled to be listed on 09.12.2021 for further orders.

19
Stage 1816/11/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal granted a short adjournment to allow the parties to file a settlement deed within two weeks and scheduled the next hearing for 08.12.2021.

20
Stage 1927/10/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal noted the possibility of a settlement between the parties and adjourned the matter to 16.11.2021 for further orders.

21
Stage 2027/09/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and directed the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections within one week, to be served via email and uploaded to the e-portal before the next hearing on 27.10.2021.

22
Stage 2113/04/2021

Hearing

No text available.

23
Stage 2222/03/2021

For Order

No text available.

24
Stage 2304/03/2021

For Order

The case was adjourned due to a lawyer strike by the Oudh Bar Association, with instructions for parties to exchange pleadings and a new hearing date set for 22.03.2021.

25
Stage 2415/02/2021

For Order

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the memo of appeal by deleting prayer clause (a) and set a timeline for filing objections and replies.

26
Stage 2522/01/2021

Final Hearing

No text available.

27
Stage 2616/12/2020

Final Hearing

No text available.

28
Stage 27Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126015262020-15-02-2021

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the memo of appeal by deleting prayer clause (a) and set a timeline for filing objections and replies.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

Dismissed Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

Dismissed

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Prabhat Kumar Tripathi

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Bal Kishor Verma
  • Amit Yadav

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126015262020-15-02-2021

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the memo of appeal by deleting prayer clause (a) and set a timeline for filing objections and replies.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for uppal chaddha hitech developers pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →