up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126015252020

Appellant / Complainant

Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority

VS

Respondent

Vivek Saxena

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

34 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015252020 by Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority against Vivek Saxena before up_rera.

2
Stage 129/05/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The appeal was dismissed following the judgment/orders previously passed in Appeal 303/2020.

3
Stage 201/04/2024

Ex-Parte

The Tribunal has heard the arguments presented by counsel for the appellant and has reserved its judgment.

4
Stage 329/02/2024

Ex-Parte

The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 01.04.2024.

5
Stage 422/01/2024

Ex-Parte

The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel and adjourned the appeal for orders/hearing to 29.02.2024.

6
Stage 518/10/2023

Ex-Parte

No text available.

7
Stage 612/09/2023

Ex-Parte

No text available.

8
Stage 724/07/2023

Ex-Parte

No text available.

9
Stage 804/07/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that the matter had already proceeded ex-parte against the respondent and scheduled the appeal for an ex-parte hearing on 24.07.2023.

10
Stage 924/04/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal decided to proceed ex parte against the respondent, Vivek Saxena, due to their failure to file objections or appear despite being duly served via newspaper publication.

11
Stage 1015/03/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed that the matter proceed ex parte if no appearance or objections are made by the next hearing on 24.04.2023.

12
Stage 1107/02/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to counsel illness and granted the respondent an additional 10 days to file objections, with subsequent timelines set for service and reply.

13
Stage 1209/01/2023

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal granted a 10-day extension to the respondent to file objections and replies, while warning that failure to appear or file on the next date will result in ex-parte proceedings.

14
Stage 1302/12/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the matter for further orders on 09.01.2023.

15
Stage 1402/11/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal within 10 days, with a subsequent reply due from the applicant within one week.

16
Stage 1523/09/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that notice was served via newspaper publication and directed the respondent to file objections to the delay condonation application and reply to the appeal grounds by the next hearing on 31.10.2022.

17
Stage 1625/08/2022

Notice

The Tribunal rejected the appellant's claim of effective service via newspaper publication and directed the applicant to publish a new notice in 'Times of India' and 'Navbharat Times' after obtaining Registrar approval.

18
Stage 1711/07/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that the respondent had not been served and directed the appellant to publish notice in a local daily newspaper, scheduling the next hearing for 25.08.2022.

19
Stage 1829/04/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the memo of appeal via speed post and email, with the case adjourned to 08.07.2022.

20
Stage 1923/03/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal dismissed the delay condonation application, ruling that the appeal was filed within the stipulated time, and directed the issuance of notice to the respondent for the next hearing on 29.04.2022.

21
Stage 2022/02/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted the applicant permission to serve notice to the respondent via dasti summons and scheduled the matter for hearing on 23.03.2022 regarding the application for condonation of delay.

22
Stage 2112/01/2022

Further Order

No text available.

23
Stage 2221/12/2021

Notice

The Tribunal allowed an adjournment application moved by the applicant's counsel and rescheduled the case for 12.01.2022.

24
Stage 2324/11/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent via registered post, e-mail, and Dasti, and scheduled the matter for further orders on 21.12.2021.

25
Stage 2426/10/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment request and rescheduled the matter to 24.11.2021 for the disposal of a limitation application and any objections.

26
Stage 2524/09/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and directed the applicant to serve the application for condonation of delay and memo of appeal via speed post and email, with the matter listed for 26.10.2021.

27
Stage 2612/04/2021

For Order

No text available.

28
Stage 2716/03/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

29
Stage 2826/02/2021

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the defective appeal to 16.03.2021 due to an advocate strike and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.

30
Stage 2929/01/2021

For Order

The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply with previous orders regarding service of notice and instructed both parties to exchange copies of the application for condonation of delay and objections via email before the next hearing on 26.02.2021.

31
Stage 3018/01/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

32
Stage 3114/12/2020

Delay condonation

No text available.

33
Stage 32Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126015252020-24-04-2023

The Tribunal decided to proceed ex parte against the respondent, Vivek Saxena, due to their failure to file objections or appear despite being duly served via newspaper publication.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

Dismissed Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

Dismissed

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Ajay Kumar Gupta
  • Rishindra Vikram Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126015252020-24-04-2023

The Tribunal decided to proceed ex parte against the respondent, Vivek Saxena, due to their failure to file objections or appear despite being duly served via newspaper publication.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →