Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Pratibha Jha, U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority Lucknow
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015222021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Pratibha Jha, U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority Lucknow before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority, ruling that the 406-day delay was not justified by sufficient cause.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent two days to file objections against the limitation application and directed the case be listed on 28.01.2022 for disposal of said application.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file a Vakalatnama and objections to the limitation application within one week, scheduling the next hearing for January 5, 2022.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange objections and replies regarding the application for condonation of delay via email and to upload their pleadings on the e-portal before the next hearing scheduled for 02.12.2021.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal directed the issuance of notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay following the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) deposit requirements.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the appellant's counsel due to his LLM examination and rescheduled the hearing for 02.04.2021.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to rectify procedural defects and ensure compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, failing which the appeal will be dismissed.
Tribunal Order #0901126015222021-10-03-2022
The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority, ruling that the 406-day delay was not justified by sufficient cause.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority, ruling that the 406-day delay was not justified by sufficient cause. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority, ruling that the 406-day delay was not justified by sufficient cause.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Ashish Chaturvedi
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority, ruling that the 406-day delay was not justified by sufficient cause.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.