Appellant / Complainant
Ghaziabad Development Authority
Respondent
Satya Pal Singh Saini
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015192024 by Ghaziabad Development Authority against Satya Pal Singh Saini before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 449-day delay was willful and not satisfactorily explained.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 12.11.2024 to allow the appellant to attempt an out-of-court settlement with the respondent.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request for time to allow the parties to pursue an amicable settlement and adjourned the matter to 17.10.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an affidavit of service and directed the respondent to file objections within 10 days, scheduling the next hearing for September 9, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal acknowledges the appellant's deposit of Rs. 12,80,022/- for compliance with Section 43(5) and issues notice to the respondent for the next hearing on 07.08.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126015192024-12-11-2024
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 449-day delay was willful and not satisfactorily explained.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 449-day delay was willful and not satisfactorily explained. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 449-day delay was willful and not satisfactorily explained.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Ram Raj
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 449-day delay was willful and not satisfactorily explained.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.