Appellant / Complainant
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
Respondent
Navendu Kumar
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015182020 by Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority against Navendu Kumar before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The appeal was dismissed following the judgment/orders passed in Appeal 303/2020.
For Order
The court has reserved the judgment for Appeal No. 306/2020 and refers to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 303/2020.
For Order
The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 01.04.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 29.02.2024.
Hearing
Due to the respondent's failure to appear or file objections despite being granted sufficient time, the Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent and scheduled the matter for an ex-parte hearing on 24.07.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to the respondent was sufficient via post and email, and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections before proceeding ex-parte.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant to correctly upload documents into the appellant's folder within one week and scheduled the case for hearing on 25.04.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to the illness of the appellant's counsel and provided one week for the filing of the affidavit of service, rescheduling the matter for 16.03.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal based on Supreme Court guidelines regarding the extension of limitation and directed the Registry to convert the miscellaneous case into a regular appeal.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the matter to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to appear despite sufficient service of notice and the need to comply with statutory timelines for disposal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for a hearing on December 1, 2022.
For Order
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to the respondent was sufficient via dasti and email, and granted the respondent a 10-day extension to file objections, warning that failure to do so will result in ex-parte proceedings.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the issuance of notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and outlined specific procedural steps for service via speed-post and e-mail.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the applicant to correct a filing error regarding misplaced documents and granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply before the next hearing on 25.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the notice via speed post and Dasti, with the case listed for hearing on 08.07.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 29.04.2022 for further orders regarding the applicant's recall application dated 16.08.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay and recalled the order dated 26.03.2021, directing the Registry to restore the appeal to its original number.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the applicant and rescheduled the case to 12.01.2022 to consider the application for condonation of delay and its objections.
Hearing on Recall App
The Tribunal issued fresh notice to the respondent due to failed service of previous notice and directed the applicant to serve the recall applications via speed post and email.
Hearing on Recall App
The Tribunal adjourned the case to 23.11.2021 and directed the parties to exchange pleadings and file originals in the Registry at least one week before the next hearing.
Hearing on Recall App
The case was adjourned due to the illness of the respondent's counsel and is scheduled for a new hearing on 02.11.2021.
Hearing on Recall App
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and a recall of the order dated 26.03.2021, directing the applicant's counsel to serve dasti summons.
For Order
The defective appeal filed by the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority was dismissed due to non-prosecution as no representative appeared for the appellant.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 26.03.2021 and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the counsel for the appellant due to his inability to attend from Delhi and rescheduled the matter for 04.03.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126015182020-23-09-2022
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to the respondent was sufficient via dasti and email, and granted the respondent a 10-day extension to file objections, warning that failure to do so will result in ex-parte proceedings.
Tribunal Order #0901126015182020-22-02-2022
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay and recalled the order dated 26.03.2021, directing the Registry to restore the appeal to its original number.
Tribunal Order #0901126015182020-23-12-2022
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal based on Supreme Court guidelines regarding the extension of limitation and directed the Registry to convert the miscellaneous case into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126015182020-01-12-2022
The Tribunal directed the matter to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to appear despite sufficient service of notice and the need to comply with statutory timelines for disposal.
Tribunal Order #0901126015182020-04-07-2023
Due to the respondent's failure to appear or file objections despite being granted sufficient time, the Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent and scheduled the matter for an ex-parte hearing on 24.07.2023.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
Dismissed Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
Dismissed
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Ajay Kumar Gupta
- Rishindra Vikram Singh
- N A
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to the respondent was sufficient via dasti and email, and granted the respondent a 10-day extension to file objections, warning that failure to do so will result in ex-parte proceedings.
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay and recalled the order dated 26.03.2021, directing the Registry to restore the appeal to its original number.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal based on Supreme Court guidelines regarding the extension of limitation and directed the Registry to convert the miscellaneous case into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal directed the matter to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to appear despite sufficient service of notice and the need to comply with statutory timelines for disposal.
Due to the respondent's failure to appear or file objections despite being granted sufficient time, the Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent and scheduled the matter for an ex-parte hearing on 24.07.2023.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.