up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126015012023

Appellant / Complainant

Sunil Kumar Rajput, Kalpana Rajput

VS

Respondent

Akhilesh Chandra Gupta

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

19 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015012023 by Sunil Kumar Rajput, Kalpana Rajput against Akhilesh Chandra Gupta before up_rera.

Delay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 106/11/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order rejecting a complaint for delay interest due to lack of inherent jurisdiction, granting the appellant liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

3
Stage 224/09/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent seven days to file objections to the appellant's amendment application and directed the appellant to reply within one week thereafter, listing the matter for orders on 06.11.2024.

4
Stage 321/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent seven days to file an objection to the appellants' amendment application and directed the exchange of soft copies and subsequent replies before listing the matter on 24.09.2024.

5
Stage 429/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to his absence from the station and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 21.08.2024.

6
Stage 531/05/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel and, upon hearing from the respondent's counsel that pleadings have been exchanged, scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 29.07.2024.

7
Stage 630/04/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

8
Stage 718/04/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for more time to prepare their brief and rescheduled the hearing for 30.04.2024.

9
Stage 813/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the filing of a rejoinder affidavit by the appellant and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 18.04.2024.

10
Stage 907/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 13.03.2024.

11
Stage 1008/11/2023

Hearing

No text available.

12
Stage 1125/09/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent a 10-day extension to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the exchange of soft copies between parties before the next hearing on 08.11.2023.

13
Stage 1209/08/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the next hearing for September 25, 2023.

14
Stage 1329/05/2023

For Order

The Tribunal deemed service on the respondent sufficient and granted them 10 days to file objections to the appeal, with subsequent timelines set for replies and portal uploads.

15
Stage 1417/04/2023

For Order

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and outlined specific procedural instructions for service of notice via email and speed-post, scheduling the next hearing for 29.05.2023.

16
Stage 1510/04/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to ensure compliance with the previous order dated 29.03.2023 and scheduled the next hearing for 17.04.2023.

17
Stage 1603/04/2023

Admission

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to submit documents regarding construction milestone demands and corresponding payment receipts, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 10.04.2022.

18
Stage 17Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126015012023-06-11-2024

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order rejecting a complaint for delay interest due to lack of inherent jurisdiction, granting the appellant liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order rejecting a complaint for delay interest due to lack of inherent jurisdiction, granting the appellant liberty to approach the appropriate forum. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order rejecting a complaint for delay interest due to lack of inherent jurisdiction, granting the appellant liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Vijay Sharma

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Tushar Bahadur
  • Sachin Gupta

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126015012023-06-11-2024

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order rejecting a complaint for delay interest due to lack of inherent jurisdiction, granting the appellant liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →