Appellant / Complainant
Apeksha Mishra
Respondent
Andromida Real Estate Consortium Pvt. Ltd.
andromida real estate consortium pvt. ltd.
₹10,51,091
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126014972020 by Apeksha Mishra against Andromida Real Estate Consortium Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's entire deposited amount with interest at the rate of SBI's MCLR+1% per annum due to fraudulent marketing practices and violation of Section 12 of the RERA Act.
Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal heard arguments from both parties in Appeal-330/2020 and reserved its judgment.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal has revised the list and adjourned the appeal to be listed again on March 1, 2023.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the appellant's supplementary affidavit and scheduled the matter for further orders on 24.01.2023.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to the absence of the Appellant and scheduled the next hearing for December 15, 2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 18.11.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and granted the appellant permission to file additional documents regarding advertisements issued by the respondent. The matter is adjourned to 21.10.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for an adjournment due to the illness of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for September 20, 2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted that written arguments have been submitted and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 24.08.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the parties to file and exchange concise written arguments along with supporting judgments within 20 days and scheduled the next hearing for July 14, 2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the appellant and scheduled the matter for further orders on 05.05.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on 01.02.2022 before Bench No. 1.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to the non-appearance of parties and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 10.01.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to formally file documents relied upon in their written submissions and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 22.12.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the Registry to locate and record a previous order dated 17.11.2021 regarding the recall of a dismissal, and scheduled the next hearing for 16.12.2021.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.
Hearing on Appeal
The case was adjourned due to a lawyers' strike called by the Oudh Bar Association and is scheduled for a new hearing on 12.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to provide evidence regarding bank approvals for the project and scheduled the next hearing for 24.02.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that the case was wrongly listed for today's date and directed it to be listed on 05.02.2021 as per a previous order.
Tribunal Order #0901126014972020-18-10-2021
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.
Tribunal Order #0901126014972020-31-05-2023
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's entire deposited amount with interest at the rate of SBI's MCLR+1% per annum due to fraudulent marketing practices and violation of Section 12 of the RERA Act.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel. The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's entire deposited amount with interest at the rate of SBI's MCLR+1% per annum due to fraudulent marketing practices and violation of Section 12 of the RERA Act. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel. The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's entire deposited amount with interest at the rate of SBI's MCLR+1% per annum due to fraudulent marketing practices and violation of Section 12 of the RERA Act.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1% per annum
Interest Period
from the date of deposit till the date of actual refund
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Ajai Krishna Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Sameer Agarwal
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's entire deposited amount with interest at the rate of SBI's MCLR+1% per annum due to fraudulent marketing practices and violation of Section 12 of the RERA Act.
Need to research all rulings for andromida real estate consortium pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.