Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Nidhi Pandya
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126014872022 by Lucknow Development Authority against Nidhi Pandya before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority, directing that it be decided in accordance with a prior judgment dated 30.12.2022 and ordering the refund of the deposited amount to the respondent/allottee.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to list the appeal for further hearing on 14.02.2025 at 10:30 a.m.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 13.02.2025 to allow the appellant's counsel to seek further instructions in the matter.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request on behalf of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 11.02.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Defect Removal
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the applicant and no request for adjournment.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an application for condonation of delay regarding the late filing of the appeal and scheduled the matter for 21.02.2023.
Tribunal Order #0901126014872022-21-02-2023
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the applicant and no request for adjournment.
Tribunal Order #0901126014872022-14-02-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority, directing that it be decided in accordance with a prior judgment dated 30.12.2022 and ordering the refund of the deposited amount to the respondent/allottee.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the applicant and no request for adjournment. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority, directing that it be decided in accordance with a prior judgment dated 30.12.2022 and ordering the refund of the deposited amount to the respondent/allottee. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the applicant and no request for adjournment. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority, directing that it be decided in accordance with a prior judgment dated 30.12.2022 and ordering the refund of the deposited amount to the respondent/allottee.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Sudhir Kumar Srivastava
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Atul Tripathi
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the applicant and no request for adjournment.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Lucknow Development Authority, directing that it be decided in accordance with a prior judgment dated 30.12.2022 and ordering the refund of the deposited amount to the respondent/allottee.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.