up_reraStatus: Active
CASE ID: 0901126014802022

Appellant / Complainant

Manju Lata Pal

VS

Respondent

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

25 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126014802022 by Manju Lata Pal against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.

2
Stage 129/05/2024

Hearing

The appellant withdrew the appeal as 'not pressed' due to a prior judgment covering the issue, with liberty granted to approach the appropriate forum for redressal.

3
Stage 216/05/2024

Hearing

No text available.

4
Stage 310/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has ordered the defective appeal to be listed for hearing on 16.05.2024 along with other similar appeals.

5
Stage 425/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 48/2022 for the relevant directives.

6
Stage 520/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the hearing of Appeal-225/2022 to 25.04.2024, to be heard alongside cross-appeal No. 48/2022, following a joint request from the counsels for both parties.

7
Stage 616/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 48/2022 regarding the current matter.

8
Stage 711/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal directs the parties to refer to the order passed in Appeal No. 48/2022 for the relevant orders.

9
Stage 806/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

10
Stage 924/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 06.10.2023.

11
Stage 1006/07/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for August 24, 2023.

12
Stage 1127/04/2023

Hearing

The proceedings were adjourned due to the absence of counsel for both the appellant (on sanctioned leave) and the respondent (on health grounds), with the case rescheduled for July 6, 2023.

13
Stage 1220/03/2023

Exchange of pleadings

No text available.

14
Stage 1309/02/2023

Exchange of pleadings

No text available.

15
Stage 1405/01/2023

Exchange of pleadings

No text available.

16
Stage 1505/12/2022

Exchange of pleadings

No text available.

17
Stage 1610/11/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for December 5, 2022, alongside cross-appeal No. 48/2022.

18
Stage 1711/10/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for November 10, 2022, to be heard alongside Appeal No. 48/2022.

19
Stage 1806/09/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and adjourned the matter to 11.10.2022 to be heard alongside Cross Appeal No. 48/2022.

20
Stage 1908/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file an objection against the application for condonation of delay and scheduled the next hearing for September 6, 2022.

21
Stage 2013/07/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and a vakalatnama, with the matter scheduled for a hearing on August 8, 2022.

22
Stage 2123/05/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the matter for hearing on 13.07.2022.

23
Stage 2228/04/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was not required to file an application for condonation of delay due to Supreme Court precedents regarding limitation extensions, and subsequently issued notice to the respondent.

24
Stage 23Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126014802022-28-04-2022

The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was not required to file an application for condonation of delay due to Supreme Court precedents regarding limitation extensions, and subsequently issued notice to the respondent.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

Dismissed as not pressed Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Active

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

Dismissed as not pressed

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Harish Pandey

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • N N Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126014802022-28-04-2022

The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was not required to file an application for condonation of delay due to Supreme Court precedents regarding limitation extensions, and subsequently issued notice to the respondent.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →