Appellant / Complainant
Shashank Saraswat
Respondent
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126014792022 by Shashank Saraswat against Lucknow Development Authority before up_rera.
Hearing
The appellant requested to withdraw the appeal due to having approached the incorrect forum (Adjudicating Officer instead of Regulatory Authority), and the Tribunal permitted the withdrawal, dismissing the defective appeal as not pressed.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a call for lawyers to abstain from judicial work by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the hearing for 17.10.2023.
Hearing
The appeal was adjourned to 11.09.2023 because the counsel for the appellant reported being ill.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to allow the appellant's counsel to file a vakalatnama and scheduled the next hearing for August 9, 2023.
Hearing
Due to the non-appearance of the respondent, the Tribunal proceeded ex-parte and scheduled the case for hearing on 04.07.2023 based on available records.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment at the request of the Respondent's counsel to allow time for brief preparation and scheduled the case for orders on 24.04.2023.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal based on Supreme Court precedent regarding limitation periods and scheduled the matter for hearing alongside a cross-appeal.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal allowed adjournment applications from both parties and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on January 2, 2023.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the defective appeal for hearing on December 1, 2022.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 09.11.2022.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal granted the respondent ten days to file their Vakalatnama and reply to the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for 10.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to provide a copy of the memo of appeal to the respondent and ordered the respondent to file objections against the application for condonation of delay before the next hearing on 06.09.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal recorded the respondent's commitment to file objections within 10 days and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on August 8, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and directed that copies be emailed to the applicant, scheduling the next hearing for July 13, 2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was not required to file an application for condonation of delay due to Supreme Court extensions regarding limitation periods, and subsequently issued notice to the respondent.
Tribunal Order #0901126014792022-28-04-2022
The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was not required to file an application for condonation of delay due to Supreme Court extensions regarding limitation periods, and subsequently issued notice to the respondent.
Tribunal Order #0901126014792022-02-01-2023
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal based on Supreme Court precedent regarding limitation periods and scheduled the matter for hearing alongside a cross-appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
Dismissed as not pressed Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
Dismissed as not pressed
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Harish Pandey
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was not required to file an application for condonation of delay due to Supreme Court extensions regarding limitation periods, and subsequently issued notice to the respondent.
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal based on Supreme Court precedent regarding limitation periods and scheduled the matter for hearing alongside a cross-appeal.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.