Appellant / Complainant
Samrat Basu
Respondent
Dhanya Promoters Private Limited (Mahagun Group)
dhanya promoters private limited (mahagun group)
₹39,66,098
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126014782022 by Samrat Basu against Dhanya Promoters Private Limited (Mahagun Group) before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal by directing the respondent to refund the appellant's principal amount of Rs. 39,66,098/- plus interest at MCLR+1%, minus a previously paid amount of Rs. 11,93,159/-, within 15 days.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for time to review newly uploaded documents and adjourned the matter to 21.10.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to study the appellant's calculation chart and adjourned the matter for hearing on 25-09-2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a one-week adjournment to allow counsel for both parties to clarify certain points and scheduled the matter for further arguments on 12.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the counsels of both parties to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the hearing for August 2, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent time to file a written explanation from their CMD and adjourned the matter for hearing/orders on 25.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and rescheduled the appeal for hearing/orders on 04.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal permitted the respondent's counsel to withdraw an application for exemption of appearance and rescheduled the hearing to 06.05.2024, directing the CMD of the respondent to appear on that date.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an exemption from appearance for the Respondent's CMD due to illness and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 08.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an application for the exemption of the Respondent's CMD from appearing due to illness and rescheduled the hearing to 15.03.2024, with a directive that the CMD must appear on that date.
Hearing
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for exemption (IA No.591/2024) and directed the CMD of the respondent company to appear personally on 04.03.2024 to answer specific queries raised in a previous order.
Hearing
The Tribunal took serious note of the respondent's failure to file a vakalatnama despite previous requests and summoned the CMD of the respondent to appear on 19.02.2024 to explain the lack of authorization.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension for the respondent's counsel to file a vakalatnama and adjourned the hearing of the appeal to 15.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a three-day strike called by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the hearing for 16.10.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent and directed the appellant to file readable copies or typed versions of the annexures before the next hearing on 06.09.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to submit additional judgments and adjourned the appeal for hearing to 22.08.2023.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 13.07.2023 and noted that if no parties appear, the matter will be examined based on available records.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged between the parties and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on December 6, 2022.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal noted a procedural defect regarding the respondent's counsel failing to file a Vakalatnama and granted a final opportunity to rectify this before proceeding under the Act.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a Vakalatnama within three days and permitted the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder before the next hearing on 26.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted sufficient service of notice on the respondent and directed them to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal within two weeks.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal and issued notice to the respondents, outlining specific procedural requirements for service of notice and filing of objections/replies.
Tribunal Order #0901126014782022-21-10-2024
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal by directing the respondent to refund the appellant's principal amount of Rs. 39,66,098/- plus interest at MCLR+1%, minus a previously paid amount of Rs. 11,93,159/-, within 15 days.
Tribunal Order #0901126014782022-19-02-2024
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for exemption (IA No.591/2024) and directed the CMD of the respondent company to appear personally on 04.03.2024 to answer specific queries raised in a previous order.
Tribunal Order #0901126014782022-15-02-2024
The Tribunal took serious note of the respondent's failure to file a vakalatnama despite previous requests and summoned the CMD of the respondent to appear on 19.02.2024 to explain the lack of authorization.
Tribunal Order #0901126014782022-07-04-2022
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal and issued notice to the respondents, outlining specific procedural requirements for service of notice and filing of objections/replies.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal by directing the respondent to refund the appellant's principal amount of Rs. 39,66,098/- plus interest at MCLR+1%, minus a previously paid amount of Rs. 11,93,159/-, within 15 days. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal by directing the respondent to refund the appellant's principal amount of Rs. 39,66,098/- plus interest at MCLR+1%, minus a previously paid amount of Rs. 11,93,159/-, within 15 days.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Mandeep Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Aahuti Agarwal
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal by directing the respondent to refund the appellant's principal amount of Rs. 39,66,098/- plus interest at MCLR+1%, minus a previously paid amount of Rs. 11,93,159/-, within 15 days.
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for exemption (IA No.591/2024) and directed the CMD of the respondent company to appear personally on 04.03.2024 to answer specific queries raised in a previous order.
The Tribunal took serious note of the respondent's failure to file a vakalatnama despite previous requests and summoned the CMD of the respondent to appear on 19.02.2024 to explain the lack of authorization.
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal and issued notice to the respondents, outlining specific procedural requirements for service of notice and filing of objections/replies.
Need to research all rulings for dhanya promoters private limited (mahagun group)?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.