Appellant / Complainant
Ishan Khanna, Vandita Khanna
Respondent
Hotshot Developers Pvt. Ltd, Supertech Limited
hotshot developers pvt. ltd
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126014722021 by Ishan Khanna, Vandita Khanna against Hotshot Developers Pvt. Ltd, Supertech Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed following the appellant's statement that the dispute had been settled and possession of the unit had been handed over by the respondent.
For Order
The order records that both counsels for the appellant and respondent were on sanctioned leave, resulting in no substantive proceedings being held on 03.08.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to allow the appellant to complete formalities regarding a settlement and possession of the unit, scheduling the next hearing for August 3, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 23.05.2023 due to the respondent's counsel being on sanctioned leave.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant following a request for more time to facilitate ongoing settlement negotiations between the parties.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 23.03.2023 to allow the parties to report on the progress of potential amicable settlement negotiations.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted the impossibility of settlement between the parties and scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on December 13, 2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a short adjournment as the parties indicated that a settlement is likely, rescheduling the matter for 17.11.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a short adjournment to the parties as they indicated that a settlement is likely to be reached, rescheduling the matter for 15.09.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal for two weeks following a joint request from counsel, noting the possibility of an out-of-court settlement between the parties.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 27.07.2022 following information that a settlement between the parties is likely.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent/builder-company to provide written details regarding an alternate unit offer and a financial statement of dues/payments within 15 days. The appellants were granted the right to respond to these details via email before the next hearing.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent builder-company to facilitate a site inspection of both the original and proposed alternate units on March 26/27, 2022, bearing the inspection costs of Rs. 5,000 and requiring both parties to document the units via video and photography for the Tribunal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal and scheduled the matter for final hearing on 25.01.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the 23-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the applicant's COVID-19 infection and the Supreme Court's Suo Motu orders regarding the extension of limitation periods, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application moved by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 13.12.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to medical reasons and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for 27.10.2021 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the applicant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the case for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 01.10.2021.
Notice
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice on the application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to exchange objections and replies regarding the delay before the next hearing scheduled for 24.03.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126014722021-20-09-2023
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed following the appellant's statement that the dispute had been settled and possession of the unit had been handed over by the respondent.
Tribunal Order #0901126014722021-12-04-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent/builder-company to provide written details regarding an alternate unit offer and a financial statement of dues/payments within 15 days. The appellants were granted the right to respond to these details via email before the next hearing.
Tribunal Order #0901126014722021-13-12-2021
The Tribunal condoned the 23-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the applicant's COVID-19 infection and the Supreme Court's Suo Motu orders regarding the extension of limitation periods, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126014722021-24-03-2021
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
Tribunal Order #0901126014722021-08-03-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent builder-company to facilitate a site inspection of both the original and proposed alternate units on March 26/27, 2022, bearing the inspection costs of Rs. 5,000 and requiring both parties to document the units via video and photography for the Tribunal.
Tribunal Order #0901126014722021-04-01-2022
The Tribunal directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal and scheduled the matter for final hearing on 25.01.2022.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed following the appellant's statement that the dispute had been settled and possession of the unit had been handed over by the respondent. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed following the appellant's statement that the dispute had been settled and possession of the unit had been handed over by the respondent.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Ishan Khanna
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Inderpreet Singh Chaddha
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (6)
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed following the appellant's statement that the dispute had been settled and possession of the unit had been handed over by the respondent.
The Tribunal directed the respondent/builder-company to provide written details regarding an alternate unit offer and a financial statement of dues/payments within 15 days. The appellants were granted the right to respond to these details via email before the next hearing.
The Tribunal condoned the 23-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the applicant's COVID-19 infection and the Supreme Court's Suo Motu orders regarding the extension of limitation periods, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
The Tribunal directed the respondent builder-company to facilitate a site inspection of both the original and proposed alternate units on March 26/27, 2022, bearing the inspection costs of Rs. 5,000 and requiring both parties to document the units via video and photography for the Tribunal.
The Tribunal directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal and scheduled the matter for final hearing on 25.01.2022.
Need to research all rulings for hotshot developers pvt. ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.