Appellant / Complainant
Vikas Chandna
Respondent
Radhey Krishna Techno Build Pvt Ltd
radhey krishna techno build pvt ltd
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126014692021 by Vikas Chandna against Radhey Krishna Techno Build Pvt Ltd before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn following a settlement between the parties, where the appellant (allottee) confirmed they have received possession of the unit.
Hearing
The parties informed the Tribunal that the dispute has been settled, though possession is pending; consequently, the matter is adjourned to 26.09.2024 for final hearing/orders.
Hearing
The parties informed the Tribunal that the matter has been settled out of court; the case is adjourned to 27.08.2024 to allow the appellant time to file the formal settlement deed.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 24.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on April 29, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel on health grounds and scheduled the hearing for April 3, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter and scheduled the appeal for hearing on March 1, 2024, due to the unavailability of counsel for both parties.
Hearing
Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for hearing on 27.10.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to a scheduling conflict and rescheduled the hearing for September 15, 2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the counsel for both parties to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 18.08.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his unavailability and rescheduled the hearing for August 10, 2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 18.07.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 22.03.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged between the parties and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 12.12.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel time to file dates and events, directing that a soft copy be emailed to the respondent, and adjourned the matter to 16.11.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments and scheduled the matter for hearing on 18.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 16.09.2022 for hearing after noting that the appellant's counsel had provided a copy of the rejoinder affidavit to the respondent.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed both parties to exchange lists of dates, events, and relied-upon case law, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 22.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 20 days to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 24.05.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file their Vakalatnama and reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing date on 02.05.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections within a week and instructed both parties to upload their respective filings on the e-portal before the next hearing scheduled for 25.03.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to the COVID-19 pandemic relaxation, registered the defective appeal as a Regular Appeal, and directed the respondent to file a reply by the next hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file objections against the application for condonation of delay and directed the case be listed on 24.12.2021.
Delay condonation
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal (Appeal-172/2021) for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice on the application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to exchange applications, objections, and replies via email and the e-portal before the next hearing on 24.03.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126014692021-26-09-2024
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn following a settlement between the parties, where the appellant (allottee) confirmed they have received possession of the unit.
Tribunal Order #0901126014692021-06-10-2021
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal (Appeal-172/2021) for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.
Tribunal Order #0901126014692021-24-12-2021
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to the COVID-19 pandemic relaxation, registered the defective appeal as a Regular Appeal, and directed the respondent to file a reply by the next hearing.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn following a settlement between the parties, where the appellant (allottee) confirmed they have received possession of the unit. The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal (Appeal-172/2021) for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn following a settlement between the parties, where the appellant (allottee) confirmed they have received possession of the unit. The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal (Appeal-172/2021) for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anurag Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn following a settlement between the parties, where the appellant (allottee) confirmed they have received possession of the unit.
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal (Appeal-172/2021) for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to the COVID-19 pandemic relaxation, registered the defective appeal as a Regular Appeal, and directed the respondent to file a reply by the next hearing.
Need to research all rulings for radhey krishna techno build pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.