up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126014562020

Appellant / Complainant

Urmila Devi

VS

Respondent

Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

21 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126014562020 by Urmila Devi against Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

2
Stage 124/08/2022

Hearing

The appeal was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the appellant. The case file is ordered to be consigned to the record room.

3
Stage 228/07/2022

Hearing

No text available.

4
Stage 318/05/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 28.07.2022.

5
Stage 412/04/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 17.05.2022 and granted the appellant a final opportunity to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply.

6
Stage 521/02/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the Appellant and scheduled the matter for hearing on 12.04.2022.

7
Stage 611/01/2022

Further Order

No text available.

8
Stage 722/12/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to file a rejoinder against the respondent's reply and adjourned the matter to 11.01.2022.

9
Stage 801/12/2021

Final Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections against the grounds of appeal and directed that a copy be emailed to the appellant's counsel, adjourning the matter to 22.12.2021.

10
Stage 915/11/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on December 1, 2021.

11
Stage 1020/10/2021

Hearing

The case was adjourned due to a Bar Council strike; the Tribunal directed the respondent to email objections within ten days and instructed both parties to upload their filings on the e-portal before the next hearing on 15.11.2021.

12
Stage 1119/10/2021

Hearing

No text available.

13
Stage 1217/09/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the appellant and directed both parties to exchange pleadings and file them with the Registry before the next hearing on 19.10.2021.

14
Stage 1323/04/2021

Hearing on Amendment Application

No text available.

15
Stage 1408/04/2021

Hearing on Amendment Application

No text available.

16
Stage 1519/03/2021

For Order

The appeal was adjourned due to the unavailability of the appellant's counsel and is scheduled to be listed again on 08.04.2021.

17
Stage 1623/02/2021

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and directed both parties to exchange pleadings before the next hearing scheduled for 19.03.2021.

18
Stage 1703/02/2021

Notice

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent via email for the next hearing on 23.02.2021 and directed the parties to exchange objections and replies through email and the e-Portal.

19
Stage 1807/01/2021

Hearing on Appeal

No text available.

20
Stage 19Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126014562020-24-08-2022

The appeal was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the appellant. The case file is ordered to be consigned to the record room.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The appeal was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the appellant. The case file is ordered to be consigned to the record room. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The appeal was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the appellant. The case file is ordered to be consigned to the record room.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Tushar Bahadur
  • Sachin Gupta

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Bal Kishor Verma

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126014562020-24-08-2022

The appeal was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the appellant. The case file is ordered to be consigned to the record room.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →