up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126013972023

Appellant / Complainant

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

VS

Respondent

Akhilesh Kumar

Disposal Award

Partial

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

18 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126013972023 by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against Akhilesh Kumar before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 106/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but settled the dispute by awarding the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 25.07.2017.

3
Stage 214/11/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing five defective appeals, ruling that when an order is challenged on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction, a liberal approach to condonation of delay should be taken to ensure substantial justice and prevent meritorious matters from being dismissed on technicalities.

4
Stage 309/09/2024

For Order

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the application for condonation of delay and has reserved its judgment on the matter.

5
Stage 407/08/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 09.09.2024.

6
Stage 508/07/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the hearing for the application for condonation of delay on 07.08.2024.

7
Stage 603/05/2024

For Order

The Tribunal noted the illness of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the defective appeal for consideration regarding the application for condonation of delay on 08.07.2024.

8
Stage 702/04/2024

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to May 3, 2024, for consideration of a delay condonation application, noting that pleadings have been exchanged and the respondent's counsel was unavailable due to illness.

9
Stage 827/02/2024

For Order

The Tribunal has revised the list and scheduled a hearing for April 2, 2024, to consider the condonation of delay in this defective appeal.

10
Stage 917/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for consideration of the condonation of delay application on 27.02.2024.

11
Stage 1013/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

12
Stage 1105/09/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a three-day strike called by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the hearing for 13.10.2023.

13
Stage 1213/07/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a final 10-day extension to the respondent to file their Vakalatnama and objections, warning that the matter will proceed ex-parte if they fail to appear on the next date.

14
Stage 1331/05/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the defective appeal and scheduled it for further orders or hearing on 13.07.2023.

15
Stage 1420/04/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections regarding the application for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for consideration on May 31, 2023.

16
Stage 15Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126013972023-14-11-2024

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing five defective appeals, ruling that when an order is challenged on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction, a liberal approach to condonation of delay should be taken to ensure substantial justice and prevent meritorious matters from being dismissed on technicalities.

17
Stage 16Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126013972023-06-01-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but settled the dispute by awarding the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 25.07.2017.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but settled the dispute by awarding the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 25.07.2017. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum.

Disposal Winner: PartialInterest Rate: MCLR+1% per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but settled the dispute by awarding the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 25.07.2017.

Ruling Awarded To

Partial

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1% per annum

Interest Period

w.e.f. 27.08.2015 to 25.07.2017

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Akhand Pratap Singh
  • Vijay Pratap Singh Chauhan

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Azhar Ikram
  • Manish Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126013972023-14-11-2024

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing five defective appeals, ruling that when an order is challenged on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction, a liberal approach to condonation of delay should be taken to ensure substantial justice and prevent meritorious matters from being dismissed on technicalities.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126013972023-06-01-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but settled the dispute by awarding the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 25.07.2017.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →