up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126013972020

Appellant / Complainant

Narendra Verma

VS

Respondent

Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd

Developer Firm

panchsheel buildtech pvt. ltd

Disputed Amount

60,83,264

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / Interest

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

32 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126013972020 by Narendra Verma against Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / Interest
2
Stage 117/07/2023

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the RERA Act 2016 does not provide a mechanism for adjudicating independent commercial arrangements such as assured returns or pre-EMI payment obligations offered by developers to attract buyers.

3
Stage 206/07/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding a grievance over non-payment of pre-EMI and subsequently reserved the judgment for further deliberation.

4
Stage 302/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that the appeal is ready for hearing and scheduled the matter for orders/hearing on 06.07.2023.

5
Stage 421/03/2023

Hearing

No text available.

6
Stage 510/02/2023

Hearing

No text available.

7
Stage 606/01/2023

Hearing

No text available.

8
Stage 706/12/2022

Hearing

No text available.

9
Stage 810/11/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a family exigency and rescheduled the hearing for December 6, 2022.

10
Stage 929/09/2022

Hearing

This text is a case heading/caption for Appeal-4/2021 between Narendra Verma and Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd., representing the formal identification of the parties and the court bench.

11
Stage 1006/09/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 29.09.2022.

12
Stage 1117/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to prepare her brief and rescheduled the hearing for 06.09.2022.

13
Stage 1227/07/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the matter and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 17.08.2022 after noting that the appellant did not wish to file a reply to the respondent's objections.

14
Stage 1319/05/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the parties to file concise written arguments and exchange them before the next hearing, scheduling the final hearing for 27.07.2022.

15
Stage 1413/04/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed both parties to file and exchange concise written submissions along with relied-upon judgments within 20 days and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 19.05.2022.

16
Stage 1509/03/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the respondent and scheduled the matter for hearing on 13.04.2022.

17
Stage 1606/01/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and set a timeline for the respondent to file objections within ten days.

18
Stage 1714/12/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the respondent to formally file its objections in the Registry and serve a copy to the appellant, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 06.01.2022.

19
Stage 1809/12/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulties and rescheduled the hearing for 14.12.2021.

20
Stage 1923/11/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and set a timeline for the respondent to file objections and the appellant to file a reply.

21
Stage 2002/11/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 23.11.2021 and directed the parties to exchange pleadings and file originals in the Registry prior to the next hearing.

22
Stage 2101/10/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulties and rescheduled the hearing for November 2, 2021.

23
Stage 2213/09/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay based on Supreme Court guidelines regarding the COVID-19 limitation extension and converted the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

24
Stage 2329/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

25
Stage 2406/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

26
Stage 2517/03/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulties and rescheduled the hearing to 06.04.2021.

27
Stage 2625/02/2021

For Order

The appeal was adjourned due to an ongoing strike by the Oudh Bar Association, with the matter rescheduled for hearing on 17.03.2021.

28
Stage 2702/02/2021

For Order

The Tribunal issued fresh notice to the respondent via email due to their non-appearance and directed the parties to exchange documents regarding the application for condonation of delay and the memo of appeal via email.

29
Stage 2812/01/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

30
Stage 29Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126013972020-17-07-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the RERA Act 2016 does not provide a mechanism for adjudicating independent commercial arrangements such as assured returns or pre-EMI payment obligations offered by developers to attract buyers.

31
Stage 30Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126013972020-13-09-2021

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay based on Supreme Court guidelines regarding the COVID-19 limitation extension and converted the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the RERA Act 2016 does not provide a mechanism for adjudicating independent commercial arrangements such as assured returns or pre-EMI payment obligations offered by developers to attract buyers. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: RespondentInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the RERA Act 2016 does not provide a mechanism for adjudicating independent commercial arrangements such as assured returns or pre-EMI payment obligations offered by developers to attract buyers.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Interest Period

from 24.06.2018 till the date of receipt of OC/CC

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Abhishek Khare
  • Aahuti Agarwal

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126013972020-17-07-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the RERA Act 2016 does not provide a mechanism for adjudicating independent commercial arrangements such as assured returns or pre-EMI payment obligations offered by developers to attract buyers.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126013972020-13-09-2021

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay based on Supreme Court guidelines regarding the COVID-19 limitation extension and converted the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for panchsheel buildtech pvt. ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →