up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126013962023

Appellant / Complainant

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

VS

Respondent

Prayag Singh Airy

Disposal Award

Partial

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

19 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126013962023 by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against Prayag Singh Airy before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 115/01/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 30.08.2015 to 08.06.2017.

3
Stage 210/12/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent due to a bereavement in their family and rescheduled the hearing for consideration of the condonation of delay application to 15.01.2025.

4
Stage 308/11/2024

Delay condonation

The tribunal adjourned the proceedings following a request from the respondent's counsel and scheduled the matter for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 10.12.2024.

5
Stage 430/09/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 08.11.2024 for orders, following a joint request from the counsel representing both parties.

6
Stage 504/09/2024

Delay condonation

The respondent's counsel requested an adjournment of the proceedings, resulting in the defective appeal being rescheduled for orders or hearing on 30.09.2024.

7
Stage 602/08/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

8
Stage 703/07/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 02.08.2024 for consideration of a delay condonation application because the respondent's counsel met with an accident.

9
Stage 803/05/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the defective appeal to 03.07.2024 for consideration of a delay condonation application and hearing, due to the counsel's illness.

10
Stage 909/04/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the hearing for May 3, 2024, regarding the application for condonation of delay.

11
Stage 1006/03/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent a 10-day extension to file objections to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the next hearing for April 9, 2024.

12
Stage 1130/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted both parties additional time to file replies and objections regarding the condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for March 6, 2024.

13
Stage 1231/10/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

14
Stage 1326/09/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to file a reply regarding the application for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on 31.10.2023.

15
Stage 1416/08/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to personal urgent work and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 26.09.2023.

16
Stage 1531/05/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal listed the defective appeal for orders or hearing on 16.08.2023.

17
Stage 1619/04/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appellant's application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to follow specific service and filing procedures before the next hearing on 31.05.2023.

18
Stage 17Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126013962023-15-01-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 30.08.2015 to 08.06.2017.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 30.08.2015 to 08.06.2017. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1 percent per annum.

Disposal Winner: PartialInterest Rate: MCLR+1 percent per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 30.08.2015 to 08.06.2017.

Ruling Awarded To

Partial

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1 percent per annum

Interest Period

w.e.f. 30.08.2015 to 08.06.2017

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Akhand Pratap Singh
  • Vijay Pratap Singh Chauhan

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • J.K. Shukla

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126013962023-15-01-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 30.08.2015 to 08.06.2017.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →