up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126013452022

Appellant / Complainant

Ankur Manchanda

VS

Respondent

Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd., Sanjeev Tyagi, Kumkum Tyagi

Developer Firm

uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.

Disputed Amount

48,73,978

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestPromotional MisrepresentationJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

24 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126013452022 by Ankur Manchanda against Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd., Sanjeev Tyagi, Kumkum Tyagi before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestPromotional MisrepresentationJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 107/05/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Ankur Manchanda, ruling that he was no longer an allottee after having transferred his rights and received consideration for the plot from Respondents 2 and 3.

3
Stage 223/02/2024

Hearing

The court heard arguments from the counsel for both the appellant and respondents, but the judgment has been reserved for a later date.

4
Stage 316/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 23.02.2024.

5
Stage 412/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

6
Stage 504/09/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings scheduled for 04.09.2023 due to a call by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh for lawyers to abstain from judicial work, rescheduling the hearing for 12.10.2023.

7
Stage 616/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the next hearing for September 4, 2023, noting that the respondent has filed the required sale deed and possession letter.

8
Stage 704/07/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce documents regarding the transfer of the unit to Sandeep Tyagi and Neetu Singh Tyagi to determine if the appellant retains any legal rights or claims as an allottee.

9
Stage 821/04/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for a passover due to the appellant's counsel's absence and adjourned the matter to 04.07.2023.

10
Stage 914/03/2023

For Order

The proceedings for Appeal-230/2022 were adjourned because the counsel for the respondent requested an adjournment due to being out of station.

11
Stage 1003/02/2023

For Order

No text available.

12
Stage 1120/12/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for February 3, 2023.

13
Stage 1224/11/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to file legible copies of disputed documents requested for forensic investigation and ordered respondents to file replies to the grounds of appeal.

14
Stage 1320/10/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal within 10 days.

15
Stage 1416/09/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal and ordered the Appellant to file objections against the Respondent's application regarding the maintainability of the appeal.

16
Stage 1518/08/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file an objection against the respondent's application regarding the maintainability of the appeal and scheduled the matter for further orders on 16.09.2022.

17
Stage 1621/07/2022

Notice

The Tribunal granted respondent no. 1 ten days to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 18.08.2022.

18
Stage 1730/05/2022

Notice

No text available.

19
Stage 1802/05/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal noted the appeal was filed within the limitation period, directed the applicant to remove registry defects within a week, and issued notice to the respondent for 30.05.2022.

20
Stage 19Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126013452022-24-11-2022

The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to file legible copies of disputed documents requested for forensic investigation and ordered respondents to file replies to the grounds of appeal.

21
Stage 20Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126013452022-07-05-2024

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Ankur Manchanda, ruling that he was no longer an allottee after having transferred his rights and received consideration for the plot from Respondents 2 and 3.

22
Stage 21Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126013452022-04-07-2023

The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce documents regarding the transfer of the unit to Sandeep Tyagi and Neetu Singh Tyagi to determine if the appellant retains any legal rights or claims as an allottee.

23
Stage 22Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126013452022-16-09-2022

The Tribunal directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal and ordered the Appellant to file objections against the Respondent's application regarding the maintainability of the appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Ankur Manchanda, ruling that he was no longer an allottee after having transferred his rights and received consideration for the plot from Respondents 2 and 3. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Ankur Manchanda, ruling that he was no longer an allottee after having transferred his rights and received consideration for the plot from Respondents 2 and 3.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 12Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Ashok Manchanda

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav
  • Bal Kishor Verma

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126013452022-24-11-2022

The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to file legible copies of disputed documents requested for forensic investigation and ordered respondents to file replies to the grounds of appeal.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126013452022-07-05-2024

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Ankur Manchanda, ruling that he was no longer an allottee after having transferred his rights and received consideration for the plot from Respondents 2 and 3.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126013452022-04-07-2023

The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce documents regarding the transfer of the unit to Sandeep Tyagi and Neetu Singh Tyagi to determine if the appellant retains any legal rights or claims as an allottee.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126013452022-16-09-2022

The Tribunal directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal and ordered the Appellant to file objections against the Respondent's application regarding the maintainability of the appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →