up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126013112020

Appellant / Complainant

Anu Jain

VS

Respondent

Utc Softech Pvt. Ltd

Developer Firm

utc softech pvt. ltd

Disputed Amount

7,72,000

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / Interest

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

16 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126013112020 by Anu Jain against Utc Softech Pvt. Ltd before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / Interest
2
Stage 124/03/2022

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit until the refund is made.

3
Stage 225/11/2021

Hearing

The tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding Appeal-5/2021 and subsequently reserved the judgment for further delivery.

4
Stage 301/11/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the applicant's professional duties during the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court guidelines, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

5
Stage 420/10/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a lawyers' strike and scheduled the matter for 02.11.2021 to address the condonation application regarding the appeal's delay.

6
Stage 519/10/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

7
Stage 623/09/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the appellant to remove procedural defects before the next hearing or face consignment to record, and established a timeline for exchanging objections regarding the condonation of delay via email.

8
Stage 712/04/2021

Compliance of section 43(5)

No text available.

9
Stage 817/03/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a complete memo of appeal with all necessary annexures and instructed the respondent to file objections to the condonation of delay application once the record is received.

10
Stage 925/02/2021

For Order

The appeal was adjourned due to advocates abstaining from work following a call by the Oudh Bar Association, with the matter rescheduled for 17.03.2021.

11
Stage 1002/02/2021

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with the matter listed for 25.02.2021.

12
Stage 1112/01/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

13
Stage 12Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126013112020-23-09-2021

The Tribunal directed the appellant to remove procedural defects before the next hearing or face consignment to record, and established a timeline for exchanging objections regarding the condonation of delay via email.

14
Stage 13Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126013112020-24-03-2022

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit until the refund is made.

15
Stage 14Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126013112020-01-11-2021

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the applicant's professional duties during the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court guidelines, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit until the refund is made. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1% per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit until the refund is made.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1% per annum

Interest Period

from the date of deposit till the refund of the amount

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Rohan Rohatgi
  • Nishant Shekhar Mishra
  • Ranjeet Kumar Pal

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Hanuman Das

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126013112020-23-09-2021

The Tribunal directed the appellant to remove procedural defects before the next hearing or face consignment to record, and established a timeline for exchanging objections regarding the condonation of delay via email.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126013112020-24-03-2022

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit until the refund is made.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126013112020-01-11-2021

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the applicant's professional duties during the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court guidelines, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for utc softech pvt. ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →