up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126013012020

Appellant / Complainant

Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority

VS

Respondent

Hari Om

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / Interest

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

27 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126013012020 by Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority against Hari Om before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / Interest
2
Stage 120/09/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal; consequently, it directed the transfer of the pre-deposited amount to the U.P. RERA for disbursement to the respondent.

3
Stage 210/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a joint request from the counsel for both parties to adjourn the appeal and rescheduled the hearing for 20.09.2023.

4
Stage 330/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal has rescheduled the hearing for Appeal-134/2020 and its connected matter to 10.08.2023 following a joint request from the counsels of both parties.

5
Stage 419/04/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for hearing on 30.05.2023, noting that it should be heard alongside the respondent's cross-appeal (Appeal No. D498/2021).

6
Stage 513/03/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 19.04.2023, to be heard alongside Appeal No. 492/2020.

7
Stage 602/02/2023

Hearing

No text available.

8
Stage 730/01/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal to be heard on 02.02.2023 along with a related defective appeal.

9
Stage 821/12/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of parties and scheduled the matter for hearing on 30.01.2023.

10
Stage 921/04/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the application for condonation of delay and reserved judgment on the issue of limitation.

11
Stage 1004/03/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for April 21, 2022.

12
Stage 1121/01/2022

Final Hearing

No text available.

13
Stage 1207/01/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.

14
Stage 1307/12/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has rescheduled the matter to January 7, 2022, specifically for the disposal of the limitation application and any related objections.

15
Stage 1425/11/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the matter for 07.12.2021 to dispose of the limitation application and any related objections.

16
Stage 1502/11/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

17
Stage 1620/10/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a lawyers' strike and rescheduled the case for 02.11.2021 to address the condonation application.

18
Stage 1719/10/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

19
Stage 1815/09/2021

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant two weeks to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 19.10.2021.

20
Stage 1930/04/2021

For Order

No text available.

21
Stage 2007/04/2021

For Order

No text available.

22
Stage 2110/03/2021

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the case for April 7, 2021, to consider an application for condonation of delay.

23
Stage 2217/02/2021

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, with a subsequent 10-day window for the applicant to reply. The matter is scheduled for listing on 10.03.2021.

24
Stage 2318/01/2021

Notice

The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with subsequent timelines set for replies and filing.

25
Stage 2426/08/2020

Notice

No text available.

26
Stage 25Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126013012020-20-09-2023

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal; consequently, it directed the transfer of the pre-deposited amount to the U.P. RERA for disbursement to the respondent.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal; consequently, it directed the transfer of the pre-deposited amount to the U.P. RERA for disbursement to the respondent. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal; consequently, it directed the transfer of the pre-deposited amount to the U.P. RERA for disbursement to the respondent.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Rajesh Chadha

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Vibhanshu Srivastava
  • Nirmit Srivastav

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126013012020-20-09-2023

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal; consequently, it directed the transfer of the pre-deposited amount to the U.P. RERA for disbursement to the respondent.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →