up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126012662023

Appellant / Complainant

Surinder Pal Singh

VS

Respondent

Sjp Infracon Limited

Developer Firm

sjp infracon limited

Disputed Amount

38,15,500

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferStructural Defects & Quality

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

21 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126012662023 by Surinder Pal Singh against Sjp Infracon Limited before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferStructural Defects & Quality
2
Stage 112/02/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal set aside the previous rejection of the complaint and ruled that the execution of a sale deed does not waive an allottee's statutory right to interest for delay; consequently, the promoter is ordered to pay interest (MCLR+1%) until physical possession and hand over the unit in habitable condition.

3
Stage 217/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file documents in compliance with a previous order and scheduled the next hearing for February 12, 2025.

4
Stage 323/11/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent time to file documentary evidence regarding the timeline of a CC application and listed the appeal for orders on 17.01.2025.

5
Stage 428/10/2024

Hearing

No text available.

6
Stage 520/09/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel to prepare their brief and rescheduled the final hearing for 28.10.2024.

7
Stage 602/09/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 20.09.2024.

8
Stage 731/07/2024

For Order

No text available.

9
Stage 811/07/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted a request from both counsels to list this appeal alongside connected appeals on 31.07.2024.

10
Stage 914/05/2024

For Order

The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel and the illness of the respondent's counsel, subsequently adjourning the appeal to 11.07.2024.

11
Stage 1012/04/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to a bereavement in his family and rescheduled the hearing for 14.05.2024.

12
Stage 1112/03/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the next hearing for April 12, 2024.

13
Stage 1205/02/2024

For Order

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections and ordered the matter to proceed ex-parte due to the respondent's failure to file objections despite multiple extensions and appearances by counsel.

14
Stage 1307/11/2023

For Order

No text available.

15
Stage 1422/09/2023

For Order

The Tribunal permitted the respondent's counsel to withdraw from the case and granted 10 days for the respondent to file objections, with a subsequent week allowed for the appellant to reply.

16
Stage 1507/08/2023

For Order

No text available.

17
Stage 1625/05/2023

For Order

No text available.

18
Stage 1713/04/2023

Admission

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and outlined specific procedural directions for service of appeal documents and filing of objections before the next hearing on 25.05.2023.

19
Stage 18Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126012662023-12-02-2025

The Tribunal set aside the previous rejection of the complaint and ruled that the execution of a sale deed does not waive an allottee's statutory right to interest for delay; consequently, the promoter is ordered to pay interest (MCLR+1%) until physical possession and hand over the unit in habitable condition.

20
Stage 19Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126012662023-05-02-2024

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections and ordered the matter to proceed ex-parte due to the respondent's failure to file objections despite multiple extensions and appearances by counsel.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the previous rejection of the complaint and ruled that the execution of a sale deed does not waive an allottee's statutory right to interest for delay; consequently, the promoter is ordered to pay interest (MCLR+1%) until physical possession and hand over the unit in habitable condition. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the previous rejection of the complaint and ruled that the execution of a sale deed does not waive an allottee's statutory right to interest for delay; consequently, the promoter is ordered to pay interest (MCLR+1%) until physical possession and hand over the unit in habitable condition.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Interest Period

w.e.f. 01.07.2016 till physical handing over of possession of the unit

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(4)(f)Section 17Section 14(3)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Atul Kumar Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Rishindra Vikram Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126012662023-12-02-2025

The Tribunal set aside the previous rejection of the complaint and ruled that the execution of a sale deed does not waive an allottee's statutory right to interest for delay; consequently, the promoter is ordered to pay interest (MCLR+1%) until physical possession and hand over the unit in habitable condition.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126012662023-05-02-2024

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections and ordered the matter to proceed ex-parte due to the respondent's failure to file objections despite multiple extensions and appearances by counsel.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for sjp infracon limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →