Appellant / Complainant
Iitl Nimbus The Express Park View
Respondent
Sudhir Kumar Sakhuja
iitl nimbus the express park view
Appellant
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126012482020 by Iitl Nimbus The Express Park View against Sudhir Kumar Sakhuja before up_rera.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal following an out-of-court settlement and directed the Registry to release the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act to the appellant upon receipt of a formal release application.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a short adjournment to allow the parties to file a settlement deed following their mutual agreement to settle the matter.
Final Hearing
The parties informed the Tribunal that the matter has been settled and requested an adjournment to file the settlement deed; the case is listed for 04.05.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a short adjournment to allow the parties to file a settlement deed and scheduled the next hearing for 29.04.2022.
Final Hearing
The parties reached a settlement where the respondent deposited Rs. 7,50,000/- and agreed that an alternative unit should be provided to the appellant; consequently, Section 43(5) proceedings are withdrawn, and a settlement deed must be filed within 10 days.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for an adjournment to allow the parties to attempt an amicable settlement and directed both the applicant's authorized representative and the respondent to appear in person at the next hearing on 07.04.2022.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 23.03.2022 for further hearing in the interest of justice.
Further Hearing
The applicant proposed a settlement of Rs. 10 lacs to the respondent, with an adjustment of Rs. 4.5 lacs for outstanding amounts and the remainder payable upon execution of the sale deed; the court directed the respondent's counsel to seek instructions on this offer.
Further Order
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Motu directions regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, and directed the Registry to register the matter as a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the parties to appear on the next date for the disposal of a limitation application and its objections, scheduling the matter for 25.11.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the memo of appeal by adding new grounds and facts, providing specific timelines for filing amended pleadings and objections.
For Order
The case was adjourned due to the absence of counsel for both parties during different rounds of hearing; it is rescheduled for 30.09.2021.
For Order
The case was adjourned because lawyers were abstaining from work due to a call by the Oudh Bar Association; the matter is rescheduled for 12.03.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the Registry to correct the name of the respondent's counsel in the cause list and adjourned the matter to 24.02.2021 upon request.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the applicant four days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the parties to upload all filings on the e-portal before the next hearing on 18.02.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the applicant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the next hearing for February 8, 2021, to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126012482020-25-11-2021
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Motu directions regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, and directed the Registry to register the matter as a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126012482020-06-05-2022
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal following an out-of-court settlement and directed the Registry to release the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act to the appellant upon receipt of a formal release application.
Tribunal Order #0901126012482020-07-04-2022
The parties reached a settlement where the respondent deposited Rs. 7,50,000/- and agreed that an alternative unit should be provided to the appellant; consequently, Section 43(5) proceedings are withdrawn, and a settlement deed must be filed within 10 days.
Tribunal Order #0901126012482020-22-12-2021
The applicant proposed a settlement of Rs. 10 lacs to the respondent, with an adjustment of Rs. 4.5 lacs for outstanding amounts and the remainder payable upon execution of the sale deed; the court directed the respondent's counsel to seek instructions on this offer.
Tribunal Order #0901126012482020-30-09-2021
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the memo of appeal by adding new grounds and facts, providing specific timelines for filing amended pleadings and objections.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal following an out-of-court settlement and directed the Registry to release the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act to the appellant upon receipt of a formal release application. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal following an out-of-court settlement and directed the Registry to release the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act to the appellant upon receipt of a formal release application.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Himanshu Hemant Gupta
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anag Narain Shukla
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Motu directions regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, and directed the Registry to register the matter as a regular appeal.
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal following an out-of-court settlement and directed the Registry to release the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act to the appellant upon receipt of a formal release application.
The parties reached a settlement where the respondent deposited Rs. 7,50,000/- and agreed that an alternative unit should be provided to the appellant; consequently, Section 43(5) proceedings are withdrawn, and a settlement deed must be filed within 10 days.
The applicant proposed a settlement of Rs. 10 lacs to the respondent, with an adjustment of Rs. 4.5 lacs for outstanding amounts and the remainder payable upon execution of the sale deed; the court directed the respondent's counsel to seek instructions on this offer.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the memo of appeal by adding new grounds and facts, providing specific timelines for filing amended pleadings and objections.
Need to research all rulings for iitl nimbus the express park view?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.