up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126012072020

Appellant / Complainant

Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority

VS

Respondent

Gaurav Prasad

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

33 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126012072020 by Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority against Gaurav Prasad before up_rera.

2
Stage 128/02/2024

Hearing

The appeal was dismissed as 'not pressed' following an amicable settlement between the appellant and respondent. The issue regarding the release of deposited funds remains subject to a future application.

3
Stage 226/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request made by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 28.02.2024.

4
Stage 317/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for 26.02.2024.

5
Stage 413/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

6
Stage 505/09/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a call by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh for lawyers to abstain from judicial work, rescheduling the hearing for 13.10.2023.

7
Stage 631/07/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to his unavailability but issued a strict warning that no further adjournments will be permitted on the next hearing date.

8
Stage 721/07/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance regarding the payment of Rs. 12,000/- in costs and directed the Registry to verify the deposit of Rs. 6,000/- into the Tribunal's account.

9
Stage 810/05/2023

Hearing

No text available.

10
Stage 929/03/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from both counsels and rescheduled the case for orders/hearing on 10.05.2023.

11
Stage 1021/02/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to pay a previously imposed cost of Rs. 12,000 for condoning delay and directed that the issue be examined at the next hearing, while allowing the appellant an opportunity to comply before then.

12
Stage 1106/02/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to deposit costs previously imposed for condonation of delay and rescheduled the hearing to 21.02.2023.

13
Stage 1209/01/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to comply with the order dated 07.12.2022 regarding the deposit of costs with the Tribunal and payment to the respondent, and adjourned the hearing to 06.02.2023.

14
Stage 1307/12/2022

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay, permitting the appeal to be registered subject to a cost of Rs. 12,000 payable to the Tribunal Fund and the respondent.

15
Stage 1405/01/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties and reserved the judgment on the point of limitation.

16
Stage 1522/12/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the counsel for the appellant and rescheduled the case for hearing on 05.01.2022.

17
Stage 1625/11/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

18
Stage 1702/11/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the case to 24.11.2021 and directed the parties to exchange pleadings and file originals in the Registry at least one week before the next hearing.

19
Stage 1820/10/2021

Delay condonation

The case was adjourned due to a lawyers' strike, with the matter rescheduled for 02.11.2021 and directions issued for the respondent to file objections to the delay condonation application and grounds of appeal.

20
Stage 1919/10/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

21
Stage 2014/09/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a scheduling conflict and directed the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections within 10 days.

22
Stage 2129/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

23
Stage 2206/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

24
Stage 2312/03/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the applicant two days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed that copies be served via email and filed in the Registry before the next hearing on 06.04.2021.

25
Stage 2417/02/2021

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 12.03.2021.

26
Stage 2528/01/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant two weeks to reply to the respondent's objections and directed both parties to upload their filings on the e-portal before the next hearing on 17.02.2021.

27
Stage 2615/01/2021

Notice

No text available.

28
Stage 2719/11/2020

Notice

No text available.

29
Stage 28Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126012072020-21-02-2023

The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to pay a previously imposed cost of Rs. 12,000 for condoning delay and directed that the issue be examined at the next hearing, while allowing the appellant an opportunity to comply before then.

30
Stage 29Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126012072020-09-01-2023

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to comply with the order dated 07.12.2022 regarding the deposit of costs with the Tribunal and payment to the respondent, and adjourned the hearing to 06.02.2023.

31
Stage 30Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126012072020-07-12-2022

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay, permitting the appeal to be registered subject to a cost of Rs. 12,000 payable to the Tribunal Fund and the respondent.

32
Stage 31Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126012072020-21-07-2023

The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance regarding the payment of Rs. 12,000/- in costs and directed the Registry to verify the deposit of Rs. 6,000/- into the Tribunal's account.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

Dismissed as not pressed Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

Dismissed as not pressed

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Prashant Kumar Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Anilesh Tewari
  • Pancham Srivastava

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126012072020-21-02-2023

The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to pay a previously imposed cost of Rs. 12,000 for condoning delay and directed that the issue be examined at the next hearing, while allowing the appellant an opportunity to comply before then.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126012072020-09-01-2023

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to comply with the order dated 07.12.2022 regarding the deposit of costs with the Tribunal and payment to the respondent, and adjourned the hearing to 06.02.2023.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126012072020-07-12-2022

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay, permitting the appeal to be registered subject to a cost of Rs. 12,000 payable to the Tribunal Fund and the respondent.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126012072020-21-07-2023

The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance regarding the payment of Rs. 12,000/- in costs and directed the Registry to verify the deposit of Rs. 6,000/- into the Tribunal's account.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →