Appellant / Complainant
Anil Kumar, Deepak Kumar Srivastava
Respondent
Sahu Land Developers Pvt. Ltd.
sahu land developers pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126012052020 by Anil Kumar, Deepak Kumar Srivastava against Sahu Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that U.P. RERA lacks jurisdiction over the project because it was an unauthorized development lacking approval from the competent authority (LDA).
Hearing
The Tribunal condoned a 210-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Moto order regarding COVID-19 limitations, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 20.03.2025 and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- on the respondent/promoter to be paid to the appellant/allottee due to the respondent's request for adjournment despite a prior stop order.
Hearing
The Tribunal has rescheduled the hearing for Appeal-535/2020 to 21.02.2025 at the request of the parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 07.02.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal has granted a request by the appellant to list the appeal for orders on 13.12.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant time to file an application for a spot inspection of the project site and scheduled the next hearing for 14.11.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the failure of amicable settlement between the parties and scheduled the appeal for hearing on merits on 23.10.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and adjourned the matter, rescheduling the appeal for hearing on 26.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment following a report of an amicable settlement between the parties and rescheduled the case for 27.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and adjourned the appeal, rescheduling the hearing for July 24, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 27.05.2024 to allow the parties to pursue an amicable settlement, noting that arguments will proceed if no settlement is reached.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 26.04.2024 and issued a strict directive that no further adjournments will be granted, noting that the case will be decided based on existing records if parties fail to appear.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appeal is ripe for hearing and scheduled it for a hearing on 09.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for 07.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of both parties and rescheduled the hearing for May 1, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for March 23, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged between the parties and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 12.12.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the completion of drainage and electrical works in accordance with the approved plan and directed the Respondent's Director to appear at the next hearing.
Ex-Parte
The Tribunal allowed the respondent's application to recall an ex-parte order, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000 to be shared between the Tribunal fund and the appellant, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 12.10.2022.
Ex-Parte
The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with a previous order and the respondent's filing of additional written submissions, subsequently scheduling the appeal for further orders on 23.09.2022.
Ex-Parte
The Tribunal directed the appellant to clarify whether the project qualifies as an 'ongoing project' under the RERA Act, 2016, following grievances regarding non-registration and revoked completion certificates.
Exchange of pleadings
Due to the repeated absence of the respondent, the Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed on 15.07.2022 for an ex-parte hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the appellant's filing of a replication and written arguments and scheduled the matter for a hearing on 05.05.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the presence of the Appellant and the absence of the Respondent, subsequently adjourning the final hearing to 14.02.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent and scheduled the case for further orders on January 10, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the respondent's counsel and directed both parties to exchange pleadings and file originals with the Registry before the next hearing on 10.12.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the limitation application, granting an extension for filing the appeal due to the COVID-19 pandemic as per Supreme Court directions, and directed the Registry to convert the matter into a regular appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to the non-appearance of both parties and scheduled the matter for further orders on 08.10.2021.
Delay condonation
The court adjourned the matter to 23.03.2021 because lawyers were abstaining from work due to a call by the Oudh Bar Association.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to the absence of both parties and scheduled the defective appeal for a revised hearing on 04.03.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file their vakalatnama and objections to the limitation application within three days and scheduled the matter for hearing on 15.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126012052020-16-04-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that U.P. RERA lacks jurisdiction over the project because it was an unauthorized development lacking approval from the competent authority (LDA).
Tribunal Order #0901126012052020-20-03-2025
The Tribunal condoned a 210-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Moto order regarding COVID-19 limitations, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126012052020-21-02-2025
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 20.03.2025 and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- on the respondent/promoter to be paid to the appellant/allottee due to the respondent's request for adjournment despite a prior stop order.
Tribunal Order #0901126012052020-08-10-2021
The Tribunal allowed the limitation application, granting an extension for filing the appeal due to the COVID-19 pandemic as per Supreme Court directions, and directed the Registry to convert the matter into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126012052020-12-10-2022
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the completion of drainage and electrical works in accordance with the approved plan and directed the Respondent's Director to appear at the next hearing.
Tribunal Order #0901126012052020-23-09-2022
The Tribunal allowed the respondent's application to recall an ex-parte order, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000 to be shared between the Tribunal fund and the appellant, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 12.10.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126012052020-15-07-2022
The Tribunal directed the appellant to clarify whether the project qualifies as an 'ongoing project' under the RERA Act, 2016, following grievances regarding non-registration and revoked completion certificates.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that U.P. RERA lacks jurisdiction over the project because it was an unauthorized development lacking approval from the competent authority (LDA). Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: 18 percent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that U.P. RERA lacks jurisdiction over the project because it was an unauthorized development lacking approval from the competent authority (LDA).
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
18 percent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- In Person
- Deepak Kumar Srivastava
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Prashant
- Sanjai Srivastava
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (7)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that U.P. RERA lacks jurisdiction over the project because it was an unauthorized development lacking approval from the competent authority (LDA).
The Tribunal condoned a 210-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Moto order regarding COVID-19 limitations, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 20.03.2025 and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- on the respondent/promoter to be paid to the appellant/allottee due to the respondent's request for adjournment despite a prior stop order.
The Tribunal allowed the limitation application, granting an extension for filing the appeal due to the COVID-19 pandemic as per Supreme Court directions, and directed the Registry to convert the matter into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the completion of drainage and electrical works in accordance with the approved plan and directed the Respondent's Director to appear at the next hearing.
The Tribunal allowed the respondent's application to recall an ex-parte order, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000 to be shared between the Tribunal fund and the appellant, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 12.10.2022.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to clarify whether the project qualifies as an 'ongoing project' under the RERA Act, 2016, following grievances regarding non-registration and revoked completion certificates.
Need to research all rulings for sahu land developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.