Appellant / Complainant
Pratibha Rai
Respondent
Abhisht Developers Builders Pvt. Ltd, Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority
abhisht developers builders pvt. ltd
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126011572021 by Pratibha Rai against Abhisht Developers Builders Pvt. Ltd, Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal by directing the Regulatory Authority to expeditiously decide the appellant's application filed under Section 63 of the Real Estate Act, 2016, after providing the respondent an opportunity to be heard.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment made by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the case for orders on 07.07.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment and scheduled the appeal for orders on May 1, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request to reschedule the hearing of Appeal-142/2021 to April 7, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the matter for orders or hearing on March 11, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for an adjournment to allow the appellant's counsel time to prepare the brief and rescheduled the matter for orders on 14.02.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel time to prepare arguments and adjourned the matter to 23.01.2025 for orders.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for January 7, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel time to prepare the brief and rescheduled the appeal hearing to 28.10.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 20.09.2024 for orders/hearing due to the absence of the appellant's counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 14.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for orders or hearing on 16.05.2024 due to the absence of the appellant's counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to reschedule the hearing of the appeal to 16.04.2024 due to the respondent's counsel being out of station.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a religious function and rescheduled the hearing for 21.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted a request for adjournment from the respondent's counsel due to health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for 26.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings and rescheduled the hearing for 13.10.2023 due to a call for lawyers to abstain from judicial work following a Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh resolution.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the counsel's inability to attend because of heavy rain and rescheduled the hearing for 05.09.2023.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 13.07.2023.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal closed the appellant's opportunity to file a replication/rejoinder due to their absence and directed the respondent to file an objection to the delay condonation application and a reply to the grounds of appeal.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal and granted the appellant one additional opportunity to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply, scheduling the next hearing for 09.11.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant and provided a final opportunity for the appellant to file a rejoinder/replication against the respondent's reply before the next hearing on 10.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal restrained the counsel for respondent no. 2 from appearing on behalf of the respondent until a valid Vakalatnama or authorization is filed, due to repeated failure to submit such documentation.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the appellant's absence, granted the respondent one week to file a Vakalatnama, and provided the appellant a final opportunity to file a replication/rejoinder within 10 days, listing the matter for hearing on 16.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed an application for recall of the order dated 18.04.2022 and directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply before the next hearing on 06.07.2022.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal noted that the respondent failed to file objections by the prescribed deadline and, noting the absence of a condonation of delay application, ruled that the objections cannot be considered until permitted to be taken on record.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the opposite party to file a reply to the grounds of appeal by March 31, 2022, noting that failure to do so would result in the forfeiture of their opportunity to file a reply.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal ruled that the appeal was filed within the limitation period and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to the absence of parties and scheduled the case for 15.12.2021 to address a defective appeal and the disposal of a limitation application.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the parties to file objections and pleadings via the e-portal and scheduled the case for 22.11.2021 to consider an application for condonation of delay.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued a fresh notice to respondent no. 2 and directed the applicant to serve the notice, application for condonation of delay, and memo of appeal via speed post and email, with the matter listed for hearing on 28.10.2021.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to remove registry defects and scheduled the defective appeal for a hearing on 23.03.2021.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to rectify registry defects within one week and scheduled the defective appeal for a hearing on 23.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126011572021-07-07-2025
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal by directing the Regulatory Authority to expeditiously decide the appellant's application filed under Section 63 of the Real Estate Act, 2016, after providing the respondent an opportunity to be heard.
Tribunal Order #0901126011572021-16-08-2022
The Tribunal restrained the counsel for respondent no. 2 from appearing on behalf of the respondent until a valid Vakalatnama or authorization is filed, due to repeated failure to submit such documentation.
Tribunal Order #0901126011572021-24-02-2022
The Tribunal directed the opposite party to file a reply to the grounds of appeal by March 31, 2022, noting that failure to do so would result in the forfeiture of their opportunity to file a reply.
Tribunal Order #0901126011572021-10-11-2022
The Tribunal closed the appellant's opportunity to file a replication/rejoinder due to their absence and directed the respondent to file an objection to the delay condonation application and a reply to the grounds of appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126011572021-18-04-2022
The Tribunal noted that the respondent failed to file objections by the prescribed deadline and, noting the absence of a condonation of delay application, ruled that the objections cannot be considered until permitted to be taken on record.
Tribunal Order #0901126011572021-15-12-2021
The Tribunal ruled that the appeal was filed within the limitation period and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal by directing the Regulatory Authority to expeditiously decide the appellant's application filed under Section 63 of the Real Estate Act, 2016, after providing the respondent an opportunity to be heard. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal by directing the Regulatory Authority to expeditiously decide the appellant's application filed under Section 63 of the Real Estate Act, 2016, after providing the respondent an opportunity to be heard.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Saghar Mehdi
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Amita Yadav
- Swetank Sharma
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (6)
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal by directing the Regulatory Authority to expeditiously decide the appellant's application filed under Section 63 of the Real Estate Act, 2016, after providing the respondent an opportunity to be heard.
The Tribunal restrained the counsel for respondent no. 2 from appearing on behalf of the respondent until a valid Vakalatnama or authorization is filed, due to repeated failure to submit such documentation.
The Tribunal directed the opposite party to file a reply to the grounds of appeal by March 31, 2022, noting that failure to do so would result in the forfeiture of their opportunity to file a reply.
The Tribunal closed the appellant's opportunity to file a replication/rejoinder due to their absence and directed the respondent to file an objection to the delay condonation application and a reply to the grounds of appeal.
The Tribunal noted that the respondent failed to file objections by the prescribed deadline and, noting the absence of a condonation of delay application, ruled that the objections cannot be considered until permitted to be taken on record.
The Tribunal ruled that the appeal was filed within the limitation period and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for abhisht developers builders pvt. ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.