up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126010552022

Appellant / Complainant

Deepak Vats

VS

Respondent

Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority

Disputed Amount

25,24,700

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / Interest

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

31 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126010552022 by Deepak Vats against Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / Interest
2
Stage 113/12/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal set aside the RERA Authority's order for possession, ruling that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by granting relief not prayed for in the original complaint; instead, it directed the respondent to refund the full amount with interest at MCLR+1%.

3
Stage 216/10/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an appellant's request for a full refund due to project delays by the GNIDA; while the respondent cited force majeure events, the court noted the delay occurred prior to those events and has reserved its judgment.

4
Stage 320/09/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 16.10.2024 for final hearing following a joint request from the counsels of both parties.

5
Stage 402/09/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a prayer to reschedule the appeal for a hearing on 20.09.2024.

6
Stage 531/07/2024

Hearing

No text available.

7
Stage 602/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and, upon joint request from counsel, rescheduled the appeal hearing to 31.07.2024.

8
Stage 708/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for July 2, 2024.

9
Stage 805/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for an adjournment to seek instructions from their client and rescheduled the hearing to 08.05.2024.

10
Stage 901/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to place an online complaint on record and scheduled the next hearing for April 5, 2024.

11
Stage 1022/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that the appeal is ready for hearing and scheduled it for further proceedings on March 1, 2024.

12
Stage 1118/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

13
Stage 1212/09/2023

Hearing

No text available.

14
Stage 1322/08/2023

Hearing

No text available.

15
Stage 1404/07/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file a reply to objections raised by the appellant and scheduled the matter for hearing on 22.08.2023.

16
Stage 1524/04/2023

For Order

The Tribunal closed the appellant's opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to repeated failure to do so despite multiple extensions, and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 04.07.2023.

17
Stage 1616/03/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 24.04.2023.

18
Stage 1706/02/2023

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal granted the appellant an extension of 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed that a soft copy be shared with the respondent. The case is scheduled for hearing on 16.03.2023.

19
Stage 1820/12/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the appellant and scheduled the matter for further orders on 06.02.2023.

20
Stage 1925/11/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for December 20, 2022.

21
Stage 2019/10/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 25.11.2022.

22
Stage 2115/09/2022

Exchange of pleadings

No text available.

23
Stage 2218/08/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the matter for hearing on 15.09.2022.

24
Stage 2301/08/2022

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal granted the respondent a short extension to file their Vakalatnama and reply to the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for 18.08.2022.

25
Stage 2423/05/2022

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to the non-appearance of the respondent and directed the respondent to file a Vakalatnama and reply within two weeks, with subsequent instructions for replication and electronic filing.

26
Stage 2513/04/2022

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal within 20 days and scheduled the matter for further orders on 23.05.2022.

27
Stage 2621/03/2022

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural requirements for service of the appeal memo and subsequent exchange of pleadings between the parties.

28
Stage 27Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126010552022-13-12-2024

The Tribunal set aside the RERA Authority's order for possession, ruling that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by granting relief not prayed for in the original complaint; instead, it directed the respondent to refund the full amount with interest at MCLR+1%.

29
Stage 28Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126010552022-24-04-2023

The Tribunal closed the appellant's opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to repeated failure to do so despite multiple extensions, and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 04.07.2023.

30
Stage 29Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126010552022-16-10-2024

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an appellant's request for a full refund due to project delays by the GNIDA; while the respondent cited force majeure events, the court noted the delay occurred prior to those events and has reserved its judgment.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the RERA Authority's order for possession, ruling that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by granting relief not prayed for in the original complaint; instead, it directed the respondent to refund the full amount with interest at MCLR+1%. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR + 1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the RERA Authority's order for possession, ruling that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by granting relief not prayed for in the original complaint; instead, it directed the respondent to refund the full amount with interest at MCLR+1%.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR + 1%

Interest Period

for every month delay till the date of payment

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • In Person
  • Srajak Srivastava

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Ajai Kumar Gupta
  • Rishindra Vikram Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126010552022-13-12-2024

The Tribunal set aside the RERA Authority's order for possession, ruling that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by granting relief not prayed for in the original complaint; instead, it directed the respondent to refund the full amount with interest at MCLR+1%.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126010552022-24-04-2023

The Tribunal closed the appellant's opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to repeated failure to do so despite multiple extensions, and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 04.07.2023.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126010552022-16-10-2024

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an appellant's request for a full refund due to project delays by the GNIDA; while the respondent cited force majeure events, the court noted the delay occurred prior to those events and has reserved its judgment.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →