up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126010532020

Appellant / Complainant

Ramaprastha Builders Pvt. Ltd.

VS

Respondent

Anil Kumar Sharma, Sachin Jain

Developer Firm

ramaprastha builders pvt. ltd.

Disputed Amount

22,21,000

Disposal Award

Partial

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Refund of InvestmentUnfair Cancellation & ForfeitureJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

21 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126010532020 by Ramaprastha Builders Pvt. Ltd. against Anil Kumar Sharma, Sachin Jain before up_rera.

Refund of InvestmentUnfair Cancellation & ForfeitureJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 130/09/2022

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directing the appellant to refund only the Rs. 5,21,000 received from respondent no. 1 with MCLR+1% interest, while clarifying that payments made to respondent no. 2 are not the appellant's responsibility.

3
Stage 201/09/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant to produce records regarding the sale and transfer of flats involving respondent no. 3 and ordered the Registry to summon specific complaint records for examination.

4
Stage 331/08/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to September 1, 2022, for further hearing due to lack of time.

5
Stage 430/08/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to lack of time and scheduled it for further hearing on 31.08.2022.

6
Stage 503/08/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a request from the respondent's counsel on medical grounds and rescheduled the hearing for August 30, 2022.

7
Stage 620/07/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the counsels for both parties one week's time to study and prepare a response regarding the respondent's status as an allottee and the applicability of the Act and Rules, 2016, and rescheduled the hearing to 03.08.2022.

8
Stage 710/05/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the case to 20.07.2022 for final hearing due to lawyers abstaining from work in protest of the Oudh Bar resolution.

9
Stage 806/04/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed both parties to exchange and file a list of dates and relied-upon cases at least seven days before the next hearing. The case is scheduled for hearing on 10.05.2022.

10
Stage 907/03/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the parties to submit a list of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments to the Registry and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 06.04.2022.

11
Stage 1007/01/2022

Final Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 24.01.2022 because the appellant requested time for Senior Counsel to argue and the current day's cause list was exhausted.

12
Stage 1105/01/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel two days to prepare her brief and rescheduled the hearing for January 7, 2022.

13
Stage 1214/12/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for January 5, 2022.

14
Stage 1322/11/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondents' objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 1,000/- to be used for the legal representatives' library.

15
Stage 1422/01/2021

Final Hearing

The appeal filed by M/S Ramaprastha Builders Pvt. Ltd. was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and their counsel.

16
Stage 1505/01/2021

Final Hearing

No text available.

17
Stage 16Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126010532020-30-09-2022

The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directing the appellant to refund only the Rs. 5,21,000 received from respondent no. 1 with MCLR+1% interest, while clarifying that payments made to respondent no. 2 are not the appellant's responsibility.

18
Stage 17Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126010532020-22-11-2021

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondents' objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 1,000/- to be used for the legal representatives' library.

19
Stage 18Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126010532020-22-01-2021

The appeal filed by M/S Ramaprastha Builders Pvt. Ltd. was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and their counsel.

20
Stage 19Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126010532020-01-09-2022

The Tribunal directed the appellant to produce records regarding the sale and transfer of flats involving respondent no. 3 and ordered the Registry to summon specific complaint records for examination.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directing the appellant to refund only the Rs. 5,21,000 received from respondent no. 1 with MCLR+1% interest, while clarifying that payments made to respondent no. 2 are not the appellant's responsibility. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum.

Disposal Winner: PartialInterest Rate: MCLR+1% per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directing the appellant to refund only the Rs. 5,21,000 received from respondent no. 1 with MCLR+1% interest, while clarifying that payments made to respondent no. 2 are not the appellant's responsibility.

Ruling Awarded To

Partial

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1% per annum

Interest Period

from the date of its receipt till the date of actual refund

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(5)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Pushpila Bisht
  • Rahul Kapoor

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Divyam Krishna

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126010532020-30-09-2022

The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directing the appellant to refund only the Rs. 5,21,000 received from respondent no. 1 with MCLR+1% interest, while clarifying that payments made to respondent no. 2 are not the appellant's responsibility.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126010532020-22-11-2021

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondents' objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 1,000/- to be used for the legal representatives' library.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126010532020-22-01-2021

The appeal filed by M/S Ramaprastha Builders Pvt. Ltd. was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and their counsel.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126010532020-01-09-2022

The Tribunal directed the appellant to produce records regarding the sale and transfer of flats involving respondent no. 3 and ordered the Registry to summon specific complaint records for examination.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for ramaprastha builders pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →