Appellant / Complainant
Gaurav Kumar Jain
Respondent
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126010472020 by Gaurav Kumar Jain against Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority before up_rera.
Further Hearing
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous because the respondent/promoter handed over physical possession of the unit to the appellant, satisfying the core grievance.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 21.11.2025 and directed the parties to file a list of dates and events, noting that no further adjournments will be granted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on November 6, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment at the request of the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 09.10.2025.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel, resulting in a dismissal for want of prosecution.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity for hearing and scheduled the appeal for final hearing on 17.10.2024, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 11.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for time for the respondent's newly engaged counsel to prepare and listed the matter for orders on 08.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has rescheduled the appeal for orders/hearing to 19.07.2024 as no parties were present during the session on 22.05.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 22.05.2024, noting that no further adjournments will be granted on the next date and the appeal will proceed based on available records if parties fail to appear.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for May 10, 2024.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that the appeal is ready for hearing and scheduled the matter for a hearing on 12.04.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for March 7, 2024.
For Order
The proceedings were adjourned at the request of the appellant's counsel to allow for the submission of supporting documents, with the matter rescheduled for hearing on 01.11.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 19.09.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application regarding the recall of a previous order and granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections, scheduling the next hearing for 31.07.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent time to file a physical copy of the application for recall of the order dated 01.09.2022 and scheduled the matter for hearing on 18.05.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for 22.03.2023 to consider an application for condonation of delay regarding the recall of an order dated 01.09.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an application to recall the order dated 01.09.2022 and scheduled the matter for further orders on 02.02.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the application for recall of the order dated 01.09.2022 and scheduled the matter for hearing on 04.01.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to re-upload their application for recall of the order dated 01.09.2022 with the necessary annexures and granted the appellant time to file a reply, listing the matter for 07.12.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 17.11.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal ruled that the appeal does not require a Special Bench and directed it to be listed before a regular bench on 12.10.2022.
For Order
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to appear in court and did not request an adjournment.
Tribunal Order #0901126010472020-17-02-2021
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to appear in court and did not request an adjournment.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to appear in court and did not request an adjournment. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to appear in court and did not request an adjournment.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Interest Period
19.09.2017 to 28.12.2017
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Ankit Raj Chaudhary
- Prashant Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Sachin Upadhyay
- Amandeep Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to appear in court and did not request an adjournment.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.