Appellant / Complainant
M Goel
Respondent
Jaiprakash Associates Limited
jaiprakash associates limited
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126010462022 by M Goel against Jaiprakash Associates Limited before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has kept the matter in abeyance due to a moratorium order passed by the NCLT.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 18.11.2024 upon a joint request from counsel and noted that the appellant may file an application for withdrawal of the appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the intervener seven days to upload an impleadment application and provide soft copies to the parties, with a subsequent deadline for replies and a new hearing date set for 03.10.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 09.09.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 30.08.2024 to allow both parties to address arguments regarding a moratorium order passed by the NCLT and a pending impleadment application.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of a delay condonation application on 29.07.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the applicant's counsel and scheduled the hearing for the application for condonation of delay on 29.04.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing of Appeal-353/2022 to 22.03.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and scheduled the matter for consideration of the application for condonation of delay on 20.02.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal dismissed the applicant's correction application as not pressed following the upload of a corrected order and granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections.
Defect Removal
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the tribunal has adjourned the defective appeal and scheduled it for orders on 24.08.2023.
Delay condonation
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal (APPEAL-353/2022) for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 16.01.2023 for further orders due to the absence of the applicant.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent an extension of time to file objections against the delay condonation application and a reply to the grounds of appeal, adjourning the matter to 15.11.2022.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections against the delay condonation application and a reply to the grounds of appeal, scheduling the matter for further orders on 12.10.2022.
Notice
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to file their Vakalatnama and affidavit of service within one week and scheduled the defective appeal for further orders on 07.09.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to remove registry defects within a week and outlined specific procedural steps for issuing notice to the respondent, with the matter listed for 05.08.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126010462022-16-02-2023
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal (APPEAL-353/2022) for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal (APPEAL-353/2022) for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal (APPEAL-353/2022) for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Naman Kamboj
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Altaf Mansoor
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal (APPEAL-353/2022) for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
Need to research all rulings for jaiprakash associates limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.