Appellant / Complainant
Aditya Narayan Yadav, Kum Kum Lata
Respondent
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad
₹12,40,620
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126010412020 by Aditya Narayan Yadav, Kum Kum Lata against U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.
Further Order
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the rejection of the appellant's complaint because the respondent was legally entitled to charge interest on delayed installment payments as per the terms of the brochure and allotment letter.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted the appellant's payment of costs and granted the respondent three days to file a reply to the grounds of appeal, adjourning the matter to 13.12.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the limitation application to condone the delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 3,000/-, split equally between the Tribunal's fund and the opposite party.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the appellant's counsel and directed both parties to exchange pleadings and file originals with the Registry before the next hearing on 29.10.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the applicant's counsel and ordered the case to be listed for a subsequent hearing on 29.09.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel additional time to find supporting judgments for an application for condonation of delay and adjourned the matter to 02.04.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for consideration of the delay condonation application to 09.03.2021.
Notice
The Tribunal recalled the order dated 03.11.2020 which had dismissed the case for want of prosecution and restored the matter to its original number.
Tribunal Order #0901126010412020-13-12-2021
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the rejection of the appellant's complaint because the respondent was legally entitled to charge interest on delayed installment payments as per the terms of the brochure and allotment letter.
Tribunal Order #0901126010412020-29-10-2021
The Tribunal allowed the limitation application to condone the delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 3,000/-, split equally between the Tribunal's fund and the opposite party.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the rejection of the appellant's complaint because the respondent was legally entitled to charge interest on delayed installment payments as per the terms of the brochure and allotment letter. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the rejection of the appellant's complaint because the respondent was legally entitled to charge interest on delayed installment payments as per the terms of the brochure and allotment letter.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Rajesh Tripathi
Respondent Advocate(s)
- N N Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the rejection of the appellant's complaint because the respondent was legally entitled to charge interest on delayed installment payments as per the terms of the brochure and allotment letter.
The Tribunal allowed the limitation application to condone the delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 3,000/-, split equally between the Tribunal's fund and the opposite party.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.