Appellant / Complainant
U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad
Respondent
Pramod Mitra
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126010332023 by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against Pramod Mitra before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal allowed all 24 appeals and set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delayed possession under the guise of compensation and that claims for structural defects must first be brought to the promoter's notice.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing 16 defective appeals and directed their conversion into regular appeals, ruling that since the impugned orders prima facie appeared to be passed without jurisdiction, the interest of justice requires hearing the matters on merit.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and directed that this defective appeal be listed alongside similar cases on 16.05.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of a condonation of delay application and a hearing on 10.05.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel on health grounds and scheduled the matter for 24.04.2024 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the hearing for the defective appeal and application for condonation of delay on 19.03.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal refers the parties to a previously passed order dated in Appeal No. D249/2023 for directions.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's request to defer filing a reply to objections and scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of the condonation of delay application on 22.02.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for consideration of the delay condonation application on 01.11.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 19.09.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for July 31, 2023.
Tribunal Order #0901126010332023-29-05-2024
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing 16 defective appeals and directed their conversion into regular appeals, ruling that since the impugned orders prima facie appeared to be passed without jurisdiction, the interest of justice requires hearing the matters on merit.
Tribunal Order #0901126010332023-12-06-2024
The Tribunal allowed all 24 appeals and set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delayed possession under the guise of compensation and that claims for structural defects must first be brought to the promoter's notice.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal allowed all 24 appeals and set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delayed possession under the guise of compensation and that claims for structural defects must first be brought to the promoter's notice. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal allowed all 24 appeals and set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delayed possession under the guise of compensation and that claims for structural defects must first be brought to the promoter's notice.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Anurag Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Pramod Mitra
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing 16 defective appeals and directed their conversion into regular appeals, ruling that since the impugned orders prima facie appeared to be passed without jurisdiction, the interest of justice requires hearing the matters on merit.
The Tribunal allowed all 24 appeals and set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delayed possession under the guise of compensation and that claims for structural defects must first be brought to the promoter's notice.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.