up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126010202020

Appellant / Complainant

Manju Yadav

VS

Respondent

Lucknow Development Authority

Disputed Amount

23,63,000

Disposal Award

Partial

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferPromotional Misrepresentation

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

32 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126010202020 by Manju Yadav against Lucknow Development Authority before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferPromotional Misrepresentation
2
Stage 131/05/2023

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the Regulatory Authority's order to direct the Lucknow Development Authority to pay delay interest at the rate of SBI's MCLR+1% for the extended period from 31.05.2012 to 06.07.2019, rejecting the developer's claim that arbitration proceedings constituted force majeure.

3
Stage 221/02/2023

Further Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from the counsel for both parties and reserved the judgment for a later date.

4
Stage 317/02/2023

Further Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 21.02.2023 for orders or hearing due to the absence of the respondent's counsel, noting it should be heard alongside Cross Appeal No. 495/2021.

5
Stage 416/02/2023

Further Hearing

The Tribunal ordered the appeal to be listed for the following day, 17.02.2023, along with a related appeal (No. D 495/2021).

6
Stage 515/02/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal has scheduled the matter to be put up on 16.02.2023 for further orders related to case number D 495/2021.

7
Stage 613/01/2023

Hearing

No text available.

8
Stage 709/12/2022

Hearing

Upon a joint request from the counsels for both parties, the tribunal adjourned the hearing of Appeal-43/2020 to 13.01.2023, to be heard alongside Appeal No. 495/2021.

9
Stage 822/11/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 09.12.2022, to be heard alongside Cross Appeal No. (D) 495/2021.

10
Stage 931/10/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for further hearing on 22.11.2022.

11
Stage 1021/09/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the appellant and scheduled the matter for hearing on 31.10.2022 along with cross Appeal No. (D) 495/2021.

12
Stage 1124/08/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal to be listed on 21.09.2022 along with cross Appeal No. (D) 495/2021.

13
Stage 1227/07/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 28.07.2022 to be heard alongside a cross-appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority.

14
Stage 1318/07/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 27.07.2022.

15
Stage 1425/05/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from the counsels of both parties to adjourn the appeal and list it on 18.07.2022 alongside Appeal No. D 495/2021.

16
Stage 1510/05/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulty and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 25.05.2022.

17
Stage 1621/04/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 1,000/- to be used for the Legal Representatives' Library.

18
Stage 1704/03/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 21.04.2022 and directed the appellant's counsel to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply before the next hearing date.

19
Stage 1824/12/2021

For Order

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a rejoinder to the respondent's reply within 15 days and scheduled the next hearing for January 21, 2022.

20
Stage 1909/12/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 24.12.2021 to be heard alongside connected Appeal No. 495/2021.

21
Stage 2023/11/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the case for hearing on 09.12.2021.

22
Stage 2126/10/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the applicant and directed the applicant's counsel to file a rejoinder affidavit, scheduling the next hearing for November 23, 2021.

23
Stage 2214/09/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the filing of the Vakalat Nama for the respondent and adjourned the matter to 26.10.2021 for further orders.

24
Stage 2313/04/2021

Hearing

No text available.

25
Stage 2417/03/2021

Hearing

No text available.

26
Stage 2518/02/2021

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to personal exigency and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 17.03.2021.

27
Stage 2627/01/2021

For Order

The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant for filing a reply to objections and directed parties to upload documents on the e-portal and exchange contact information.

28
Stage 2712/01/2021

Hearing

No text available.

29
Stage 2807/12/2020

Hearing

No text available.

30
Stage 29Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126010202020-21-04-2022

The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 1,000/- to be used for the Legal Representatives' Library.

31
Stage 30Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126010202020-31-05-2023

The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the Regulatory Authority's order to direct the Lucknow Development Authority to pay delay interest at the rate of SBI's MCLR+1% for the extended period from 31.05.2012 to 06.07.2019, rejecting the developer's claim that arbitration proceedings constituted force majeure.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the Regulatory Authority's order to direct the Lucknow Development Authority to pay delay interest at the rate of SBI's MCLR+1% for the extended period from 31.05.2012 to 06.07.2019, rejecting the developer's claim that arbitration proceedings constituted force majeure. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1%.

Disposal Winner: PartialInterest Rate: MCLR + 1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the Regulatory Authority's order to direct the Lucknow Development Authority to pay delay interest at the rate of SBI's MCLR+1% for the extended period from 31.05.2012 to 06.07.2019, rejecting the developer's claim that arbitration proceedings constituted force majeure.

Ruling Awarded To

Partial

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR + 1%

Interest Period

from 31.05.2012 to 06.07.2019

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(4)(f)Section 17Section 12

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Anoop Kumar

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Saurabh Misra
  • N A

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126010202020-21-04-2022

The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 1,000/- to be used for the Legal Representatives' Library.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126010202020-31-05-2023

The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the Regulatory Authority's order to direct the Lucknow Development Authority to pay delay interest at the rate of SBI's MCLR+1% for the extended period from 31.05.2012 to 06.07.2019, rejecting the developer's claim that arbitration proceedings constituted force majeure.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →