Appellant / Complainant
Kamal Krishna Chowdhary
Respondent
U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Anr
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126010002020 by Kamal Krishna Chowdhary against U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Anr before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and their counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 06.02.2024 due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment and rescheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 12.05.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to personal issues and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 31.03.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a reply to the respondent's supplementary affidavit and scheduled the next hearing for February 2, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on January 9, 2023, noting that pleadings have been exchanged.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to file a reply to the respondent's supplementary affidavit within one week and scheduled the next hearing for 07.12.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file an affidavit responding to previous queries and scheduled the next hearing for November 11, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that no time was available for hearing and ordered the appeal to be listed on 11.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal observed that the demand for additional farmer compensation arose in 2013, prior to the execution of the Builder Buyer Agreement in 2017, and directed the respondent's counsel to seek instructions on why this demand is being enforced against the appellant.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the next hearing for September 22, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 24 hours to file a reply to the respondent's objections and adjourned the appeal to 02.09.2022 upon joint request of the counsels.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the appellant's absence and granted a final opportunity to file a replication/rejoinder within 10 days, scheduling the next hearing for 16.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply within 20 days and scheduled the next hearing for July 6, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for April 15, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 2 to file their Vakalatnama and objections to the grounds of appeal within specified timelines and scheduled the matter for hearing on 12.01.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned a 7-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court guidelines regarding COVID-19 limitations, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal proceeded ex-parte against the respondent due to non-appearance and directed the Registry to summon records for the next hearing on 06.12.2021 regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Hearing
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to the respondent is deemed sufficient based on postal tracking and digital communications (WhatsApp/SMS), and directed the parties to file objections regarding condonation of delay and grounds of appeal via e-mail and the e-Portal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel three days to file an affidavit of service and scheduled the next hearing for November 1, 2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed an application to defer the hearing as 'not pressed' and directed the appellant to file an amended memo of appeal and serve the respondent via speed post and email regarding the condonation of delay application.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to take steps for service upon the respondent and directed the exchange of appeal documents via email, scheduling the next hearing for 25.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal corrected a clerical error regarding counsel representation and granted the appellant one week's extension to take steps for service of notice, scheduling the next hearing for March 3, 2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126010002020-22-09-2022
The Tribunal observed that the demand for additional farmer compensation arose in 2013, prior to the execution of the Builder Buyer Agreement in 2017, and directed the respondent's counsel to seek instructions on why this demand is being enforced against the appellant.
Tribunal Order #0901126010002020-06-12-2021
The Tribunal condoned a 7-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court guidelines regarding COVID-19 limitations, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126010002020-01-11-2021
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to the respondent is deemed sufficient based on postal tracking and digital communications (WhatsApp/SMS), and directed the parties to file objections regarding condonation of delay and grounds of appeal via e-mail and the e-Portal.
Tribunal Order #0901126010002020-17-09-2021
The Tribunal dismissed an application to defer the hearing as 'not pressed' and directed the appellant to file an amended memo of appeal and serve the respondent via speed post and email regarding the condonation of delay application.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
Dismissed Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
Dismissed
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Saghar Mehdi
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Surya Bhan Singh
- Arpan Prakash Srivastava
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal observed that the demand for additional farmer compensation arose in 2013, prior to the execution of the Builder Buyer Agreement in 2017, and directed the respondent's counsel to seek instructions on why this demand is being enforced against the appellant.
The Tribunal condoned a 7-day delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court guidelines regarding COVID-19 limitations, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to the respondent is deemed sufficient based on postal tracking and digital communications (WhatsApp/SMS), and directed the parties to file objections regarding condonation of delay and grounds of appeal via e-mail and the e-Portal.
The Tribunal dismissed an application to defer the hearing as 'not pressed' and directed the appellant to file an amended memo of appeal and serve the respondent via speed post and email regarding the condonation of delay application.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.