Appellant / Complainant
Ashish Gupta
Respondent
Nitin Rana
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126009732020 by Ashish Gupta against Nitin Rana before up_rera.
For Order
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for direct release of deposited funds and instead directed that the amount be transmitted to RERA to be adjusted against ongoing execution proceedings.
For Order
The tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the illness of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for a hearing on 01.08.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the applicant/promoter one week to file objections regarding the respondent's application for the release of a deposited amount and scheduled the matter for hearing on 22.07.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal issued notice to the appellant regarding an application (IA No. 704/2022) filed by the respondent for the release of funds deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act and set a hearing date for 05.07.2022.
Delay condonation
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal filed by Ashish Gupta due to the non-appearance of the appellant and his counsel.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with subsequent timelines set for replies and electronic filing.
Tribunal Order #0901126009732020-01-08-2022
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for direct release of deposited funds and instead directed that the amount be transmitted to RERA to be adjusted against ongoing execution proceedings.
Tribunal Order #0901126009732020-18-10-2021
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal filed by Ashish Gupta due to the non-appearance of the appellant and his counsel.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for direct release of deposited funds and instead directed that the amount be transmitted to RERA to be adjusted against ongoing execution proceedings. The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal filed by Ashish Gupta due to the non-appearance of the appellant and his counsel. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for direct release of deposited funds and instead directed that the amount be transmitted to RERA to be adjusted against ongoing execution proceedings. The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal filed by Ashish Gupta due to the non-appearance of the appellant and his counsel.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
- Raj Singh
- Saurabh Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- R C Dwivedi
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for direct release of deposited funds and instead directed that the amount be transmitted to RERA to be adjusted against ongoing execution proceedings.
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal filed by Ashish Gupta due to the non-appearance of the appellant and his counsel.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.