Appellant / Complainant
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad
Respondent
Vikram Singh Yadav
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126009712020 by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad against Vikram Singh Yadav before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal rejected the appeals filed by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and directed that funds deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disposal, while granting respondents liberty to apply for the release of such amounts.
Part Heard
The Tribunal reserved its judgment after directing both parties to submit and exchange legal authorities regarding whether the husband of an allottee qualifies as an 'allottee' under Section 2(d) of the U.P. Real Estate Act, 2016.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the parties to file and exchange lists of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments, scheduling the next hearing for December 23, 2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the applicant's limitation application to condone a procedural delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000, and directed the registry to convert the miscellaneous case into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a better affidavit in support of their application for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on 29.10.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for consideration of the delay condonation application to 01.10.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a better affidavit regarding their application for condonation of delay and directed the exchange of documents via email before the next hearing on 06.04.2021.
For Order
The case was adjourned because advocates were abstaining from work due to a call by the Oudh Bar Association; the matter is rescheduled for 17.03.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a revised application for condonation of delay supported by an improved affidavit and scheduled the next hearing for 11.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126009712020-29-10-2021
The Tribunal allowed the applicant's limitation application to condone a procedural delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000, and directed the registry to convert the miscellaneous case into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126009712020-25-11-2022
The Tribunal rejected the appeals filed by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and directed that funds deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disposal, while granting respondents liberty to apply for the release of such amounts.
Tribunal Order #0901126009712020-23-12-2021
The Tribunal reserved its judgment after directing both parties to submit and exchange legal authorities regarding whether the husband of an allottee qualifies as an 'allottee' under Section 2(d) of the U.P. Real Estate Act, 2016.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the appeals filed by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and directed that funds deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disposal, while granting respondents liberty to apply for the release of such amounts. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the appeals filed by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and directed that funds deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disposal, while granting respondents liberty to apply for the release of such amounts.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- N N Pandey
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Uttam Kumar Tripathi
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal allowed the applicant's limitation application to condone a procedural delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000, and directed the registry to convert the miscellaneous case into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal rejected the appeals filed by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and directed that funds deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act be transferred to the Regulatory Authority for disposal, while granting respondents liberty to apply for the release of such amounts.
The Tribunal reserved its judgment after directing both parties to submit and exchange legal authorities regarding whether the husband of an allottee qualifies as an 'allottee' under Section 2(d) of the U.P. Real Estate Act, 2016.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.