Appellant / Complainant
Rakesh Kumar Singh
Respondent
Lucknow Development Authority
₹48,72,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126009692020 by Rakesh Kumar Singh against Lucknow Development Authority before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to not press the appeal after acknowledging that the claim for compensation was filed in the wrong forum, granting liberty to approach the appropriate legal forum for redressal.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant and, upon information from the respondent's counsel that the matter is ready, scheduled the appeal for hearing on 21.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to review previous judgments regarding compensation and rescheduled the appeal hearing for 25.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant due to counsel being out of station and rescheduled the hearing for 20.03.2024, warning that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The proceedings were adjourned due to the illness of the appellant's counsel, with the matter rescheduled for hearing on 04.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 30.10.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings because the appellant's counsel was unable to attend, and rescheduled the hearing for 17.05.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request made by the appellant's counsel due to their unavailability and rescheduled the hearing for 04.04.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulty and rescheduled the matter for orders on 20.01.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant two days' additional time to prepare his brief and rescheduled the hearing for 21.11.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 18.11.2022 after the appellant's counsel requested time to prepare arguments regarding the justification for introducing new evidence at the appellate stage.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 17.11.2022 and directed the parties to exchange their pleadings in the meantime.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appellant's application for production of documents and receiving evidence on affidavit, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 12.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's co-counsel due to an accident and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 12.09.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 18.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal permitted Sri Samarth Saxena to argue on behalf of the appellant and granted a one-week extension for the counsel to prepare his brief, listing the matter for 10.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's extension to prepare his brief and rescheduled the hearing for 25.07.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 18.07.2022 for hearing because the appellant's counsel was unwell.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted a request for adjournment from the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 25.05.2022, noting that pleadings are complete.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the parties to file concise written submissions along with relied-upon judgments within 20 days and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 23.05.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to the non-appearance of the appellant and scheduled it for a hearing on 13.04.2022.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to email their objections to the appellant's counsel and ordered the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder before the next hearing on 12.01.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Motu orders regarding the extension of limitation periods due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the case to 26.11.2021 and directed the parties to exchange pleadings and file originals in the Registry at least one week before the next hearing.
Delay condonation
The case was adjourned due to a lawyers' strike following the murder of a counsel in Shahjahanpur; the matter is rescheduled for 02.11.2021 to address the limitation application.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant for filing a better affidavit in support of their application for condonation of delay and scheduled the hearing for 19.10.2021.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the applicant one week to file a better affidavit regarding the application for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on 30.09.2021.
Delay condonation
The case was adjourned to 01.04.2021 because lawyers were abstaining from work due to a call by the Bar Association.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the registry to record the respondent's counsel and scheduled a hearing for March 5, 2021, to consider an application for condonation of delay regarding this defective appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal listed the case for 17.02.2021 to consider an application for condonation of delay and warned that the matter may proceed ex-parte if the respondent fails to appear.
Tribunal Order #0901126009692020-21-05-2024
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to not press the appeal after acknowledging that the claim for compensation was filed in the wrong forum, granting liberty to approach the appropriate legal forum for redressal.
Tribunal Order #0901126009692020-25-11-2021
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Motu orders regarding the extension of limitation periods due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to not press the appeal after acknowledging that the claim for compensation was filed in the wrong forum, granting liberty to approach the appropriate legal forum for redressal. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to not press the appeal after acknowledging that the claim for compensation was filed in the wrong forum, granting liberty to approach the appropriate legal forum for redressal.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Rakesh Kumar Agarwal
- Saksham Agarwal
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to not press the appeal after acknowledging that the claim for compensation was filed in the wrong forum, granting liberty to approach the appropriate legal forum for redressal.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Motu orders regarding the extension of limitation periods due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.