up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126009202025

Appellant / Complainant

Ratan Buildtech Private Limited

VS

Respondent

Vishal Mani Chaturvedi

Developer Firm

ratan buildtech private limited

Disputed Amount

29,01,340

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

19 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126009202025 by Ratan Buildtech Private Limited against Vishal Mani Chaturvedi before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 109/04/2026

Delay condonation

The Tribunal quashed an order passed by the Adjudicating Officer for lack of jurisdiction, ruled that the principle of res judicata does not apply to void orders, and directed the promoter to pay interest for the entire delay period (01.07.2019 to 02.11.2022) without any Covid-19 force majeure deductions.

3
Stage 217/03/2026

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 09.04.2026 to consider an application for condonation of delay, noting that no further adjournments will be granted to the appellant.

4
Stage 313/03/2026

Delay condonation

No text available.

5
Stage 412/02/2026

Delay condonation

Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the defective appeal to 17.03.2026 for consideration of the delay condonation application and hearing.

6
Stage 521/01/2026

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant time to prepare her brief and directed both parties to argue the delay condonation application at the next hearing on 12.02.2026.

7
Stage 615/12/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for orders to 21.01.2026.

8
Stage 725/11/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 15.12.2025.

9
Stage 804/11/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 25.11.2025.

10
Stage 907/10/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment request made by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the case for hearing/orders on 04.11.2025.

11
Stage 1004/09/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the Appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for the application for condonation of delay to 07.10.2025.

12
Stage 1120/08/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 04.09.2025.

13
Stage 1230/07/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the respondent to upload objections on the portal within three days and granted the appellant ten days to file a rejoinder, scheduling the next hearing for August 20, 2025.

14
Stage 1309/07/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a final ten-day extension for the respondent to file objections and allowed seven days for the appellant to file a rejoinder, scheduling the next hearing for July 30, 2025.

15
Stage 1415/05/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the delay condonation application and the memo of appeal, and scheduled the next hearing for July 9, 2025.

16
Stage 1528/04/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and directed the appellant to reply within a week, subsequently scheduling the hearing for the defective appeal on 15.05.2025.

17
Stage 1601/04/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and outlined procedural directions for service of the appeal and condonation of delay application, while clarifying that the impugned order remains enforceable during the pendency of the appeal.

18
Stage 17Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126009202025-09-04-2026

The Tribunal quashed an order passed by the Adjudicating Officer for lack of jurisdiction, ruled that the principle of res judicata does not apply to void orders, and directed the promoter to pay interest for the entire delay period (01.07.2019 to 02.11.2022) without any Covid-19 force majeure deductions.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed an order passed by the Adjudicating Officer for lack of jurisdiction, ruled that the principle of res judicata does not apply to void orders, and directed the promoter to pay interest for the entire delay period (01.07.2019 to 02.11.2022) without any Covid-19 force majeure deductions. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1 percent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentInterest Rate: MCLR+1 percentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed an order passed by the Adjudicating Officer for lack of jurisdiction, ruled that the principle of res judicata does not apply to void orders, and directed the promoter to pay interest for the entire delay period (01.07.2019 to 02.11.2022) without any Covid-19 force majeure deductions.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1 percent

Interest Period

w.e.f. 01.07.2019 till the date of occupancy/completion certificate OC/CC or the date of offer of possession, whichever is later

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Mahima Pahwa

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Azhar Ikram
  • Manish Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126009202025-09-04-2026

The Tribunal quashed an order passed by the Adjudicating Officer for lack of jurisdiction, ruled that the principle of res judicata does not apply to void orders, and directed the promoter to pay interest for the entire delay period (01.07.2019 to 02.11.2022) without any Covid-19 force majeure deductions.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for ratan buildtech private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →