Appellant / Complainant
Ghaziabad Development Authority
Respondent
Jitten Mittal
Partial
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126008772022 by Ghaziabad Development Authority against Jitten Mittal before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 10.10.2017 to 16.07.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant, scheduling the case for orders on 08.04.2025, with a strict directive that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for March 17, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 19.02.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 30.01.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on January 9, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal has granted a request by the appellant's counsel to reschedule the appeal for orders/hearing to 27.11.2024.
Hearing
The court granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a family bereavement and rescheduled the matter for orders/hearing on 22.10.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 12.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appellant declined to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 15.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 15.04.2024 because both the counsel for the appellant and the respondent were unavailable.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the appellant's decision not to file a reply to objections and granted an adjournment to the respondent due to medical urgency, scheduling the next hearing for 11.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 01.11.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant's counsel but issued a warning that repeated requests for adjournment due to being 'out of station' will not be accepted in the future, noting the statutory 60-day mandate for decision-making.
Hearing
The court granted an adjournment as both the counsel for the appellant and the respondent were unavailable due to being out of station and medical grounds, respectively, and rescheduled the matter for 02.08.2023.
Hearing
The proceedings were adjourned due to a request for adjournment from the respondent's counsel on the grounds of illness, with the case rescheduled for hearing on 22.05.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to reschedule the hearing of the appeal to 18.04.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant's counsel, who was unprepared to argue, and rescheduled the hearing for 12.04.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a scheduling conflict and rescheduled the hearing for 23.03.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and scheduled the matter for hearing on 12.12.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal noted a discrepancy regarding the filing of the appellant's reply to objections and directed the appellant's counsel to resolve any technical defects before the next hearing on 23.11.2022.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and upload it to the e-portal, scheduling the next hearing for 18.10.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant and rescheduled the case for hearing on 13.09.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for August 22, 2022, to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the service of a soft copy via email, scheduling the next hearing for July 27, 2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the appellant to serve the notice and appeal documents via speed-post and email, while also directing the accounts department to verify a deposit of Rs. 2,43,430.00.
Tribunal Order #0901126008772022-08-04-2025
The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 10.10.2017 to 16.07.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126008772022-11-05-2022
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the appellant to serve the notice and appeal documents via speed-post and email, while also directing the accounts department to verify a deposit of Rs. 2,43,430.00.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 10.10.2017 to 16.07.2021. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1 percent per annum.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 10.10.2017 to 16.07.2021.
Ruling Awarded To
Partial
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1 percent per annum
Interest Period
w.e.f. 10.10.2017 to 16.07.2021
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Arvind Kumar
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Tushar Bahadur
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 10.10.2017 to 16.07.2021.
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the appellant to serve the notice and appeal documents via speed-post and email, while also directing the accounts department to verify a deposit of Rs. 2,43,430.00.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.