Appellant / Complainant
Sher Bahadur Singh
Respondent
Paramount Prop Build Pvt Ltd
paramount prop build pvt ltd
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126008442021 by Sher Bahadur Singh against Paramount Prop Build Pvt Ltd before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable, ruling that because the project received its completion certificate in 2015, it does not qualify as an 'ongoing project' under the RERA Act, 2016. The respondent agreed to pay a penalty of Rs. 5,000 imposed by the previous order.
Hearing
The hearing of the appeal is adjourned because the counsel for the appellant is on sanctioned leave; the matter is rescheduled for 16.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his absence and scheduled the matter for a hearing on 27.07.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for July 26, 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the Respondent to appear with a definite settlement proposal through an authorized representative and ordered both parties to complete their pleadings before the next hearing on 16.05.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to meet with the respondent at their Noida office on 28.03.2022 for settlement discussions and ordered the respondent to allot an alternate unit to the appellant if available.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the Respondent's Director/authorized representative due to their failure to appear, and directed the Respondent to ensure representation by an empowered official at the next hearing.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to appear in person and ordered the respondent to be represented by a Director or authorized representative empowered to make final decisions regarding the dispute over villa possession and alternative unit allotment.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 20.01.2022.
Hearing
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for a hearing on 06.01.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objection, subject to a cost of Rs. 100/- to be used for library books.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file objections to the respondent's reply and scheduled the matter for 22.11.2021 to dispose of the limitation application.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appeal was filed within limitation and directed the respondent's counsel to file their Vakalat Nama and a reply to the appeal by the next hearing on 28.09.2021.
Notice
The Tribunal noted the respondent's absence despite service of notice and directed that a fresh notice be sent via email, while ordering both parties to exchange objections and upload documents on the e-portal before the next hearing.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent via registered post and email and scheduled the matter for hearing on 26.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126008442021-21-03-2022
The Tribunal imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the Respondent's Director/authorized representative due to their failure to appear, and directed the Respondent to ensure representation by an empowered official at the next hearing.
Tribunal Order #0901126008442021-22-11-2021
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objection, subject to a cost of Rs. 100/- to be used for library books.
Tribunal Order #0901126008442021-16-08-2022
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable, ruling that because the project received its completion certificate in 2015, it does not qualify as an 'ongoing project' under the RERA Act, 2016. The respondent agreed to pay a penalty of Rs. 5,000 imposed by the previous order.
Tribunal Order #0901126008442021-04-04-2022
The Tribunal directed the Respondent to appear with a definite settlement proposal through an authorized representative and ordered both parties to complete their pleadings before the next hearing on 16.05.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126008442021-22-03-2022
The Tribunal directed the appellant to meet with the respondent at their Noida office on 28.03.2022 for settlement discussions and ordered the respondent to allot an alternate unit to the appellant if available.
Tribunal Order #0901126008442021-03-03-2022
The Tribunal directed the appellant to appear in person and ordered the respondent to be represented by a Director or authorized representative empowered to make final decisions regarding the dispute over villa possession and alternative unit allotment.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable, ruling that because the project received its completion certificate in 2015, it does not qualify as an 'ongoing project' under the RERA Act, 2016. The respondent agreed to pay a penalty of Rs. 5,000 imposed by the previous order. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable, ruling that because the project received its completion certificate in 2015, it does not qualify as an 'ongoing project' under the RERA Act, 2016. The respondent agreed to pay a penalty of Rs. 5,000 imposed by the previous order.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Kushagra Dikshit
- Anshul Baranwal
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Shukla
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (6)
The Tribunal imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the Respondent's Director/authorized representative due to their failure to appear, and directed the Respondent to ensure representation by an empowered official at the next hearing.
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objection, subject to a cost of Rs. 100/- to be used for library books.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable, ruling that because the project received its completion certificate in 2015, it does not qualify as an 'ongoing project' under the RERA Act, 2016. The respondent agreed to pay a penalty of Rs. 5,000 imposed by the previous order.
The Tribunal directed the Respondent to appear with a definite settlement proposal through an authorized representative and ordered both parties to complete their pleadings before the next hearing on 16.05.2022.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to meet with the respondent at their Noida office on 28.03.2022 for settlement discussions and ordered the respondent to allot an alternate unit to the appellant if available.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to appear in person and ordered the respondent to be represented by a Director or authorized representative empowered to make final decisions regarding the dispute over villa possession and alternative unit allotment.
Need to research all rulings for paramount prop build pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.