Appellant / Complainant
Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Prashant Kumar Agarwal
uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126008292023 by Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Prashant Kumar Agarwal before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay, dismissed the appeal, and ordered the transfer of the appellant's deposited funds to the Regulatory Authority for use in execution proceedings.
Delay condonation
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the appellant, and the court directed that the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act 2016 be released to the respondent as per law.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections and directed the appellant to file a reply within one week thereafter, scheduling the next hearing for April 3, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 10.03.2025 and directed that pleadings be completed in the interim.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appeal and the delay condonation application, scheduling the next hearing for January 13, 2025.
Tribunal Order #0901126008292023-07-07-2025
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay, dismissed the appeal, and ordered the transfer of the appellant's deposited funds to the Regulatory Authority for use in execution proceedings.
Tribunal Order #0901126008292023-03-04-2025
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the appellant, and the court directed that the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act 2016 be released to the respondent as per law.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay, dismissed the appeal, and ordered the transfer of the appellant's deposited funds to the Regulatory Authority for use in execution proceedings. The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the appellant, and the court directed that the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act 2016 be released to the respondent as per law. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay, dismissed the appeal, and ordered the transfer of the appellant's deposited funds to the Regulatory Authority for use in execution proceedings. The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the appellant, and the court directed that the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act 2016 be released to the respondent as per law.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Surangama Sharma
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Mandeep Singh
- Rohit Jaiswal
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay, dismissed the appeal, and ordered the transfer of the appellant's deposited funds to the Regulatory Authority for use in execution proceedings.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the appellant, and the court directed that the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act 2016 be released to the respondent as per law.
Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.