up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126007642021

Appellant / Complainant

Neelam Singh

VS

Respondent

Palash Infratech Pvt Ltd

Developer Firm

palash infratech pvt ltd

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Jurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

18 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126007642021 by Neelam Singh against Palash Infratech Pvt Ltd before up_rera.

Jurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 112/05/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, rendering the complaint and appeal non-maintainable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

3
Stage 228/04/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant two days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 12.05.2022 regarding the application for condonation of delay.

4
Stage 316/03/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the non-appearance of parties and scheduled the matter for further orders on 28.04.2022.

5
Stage 428/02/2022

Further Order

No text available.

6
Stage 518/01/2022

Delay condonation

No text available.

7
Stage 605/01/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel three days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on January 18, 2022.

8
Stage 710/12/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel permission to file a replication/rejoinder affidavit and scheduled the next hearing for January 5, 2022.

9
Stage 826/11/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the Registry to verify the Vakalatnama of the applicant's counsel and granted the applicant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections.

10
Stage 909/11/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for November 26, 2021.

11
Stage 1006/10/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and directed both parties to exchange pleadings and file originals with the Registry at least seven days before the next hearing on 09.11.2021.

12
Stage 1120/04/2021

Hearing

No text available.

13
Stage 1226/03/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

14
Stage 1304/03/2021

Defect Removal

No text available.

15
Stage 1415/02/2021

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to remove registry defects and directed the respondent to file objections within a week, with subsequent replies to be exchanged via email.

16
Stage 1503/02/2021

Admission

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to rectify procedural defects in the appeal and scheduled the matter for hearing on 15.02.2021.

17
Stage 16Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126007642021-12-05-2022

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, rendering the complaint and appeal non-maintainable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, rendering the complaint and appeal non-maintainable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, rendering the complaint and appeal non-maintainable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Shailender Singh
  • Jayendra Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Vijay Vikram

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126007642021-12-05-2022

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project was not registered with RERA, rendering the complaint and appeal non-maintainable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for palash infratech pvt ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →