up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126007452021

Appellant / Complainant

Mayank Kumar Khanna

VS

Respondent

Royal Hometown Planners Pvt Ltd

Developer Firm

royal hometown planners pvt ltd

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

38 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126007452021 by Mayank Kumar Khanna against Royal Hometown Planners Pvt Ltd before up_rera.

2
Stage 119/11/2024

Hearing

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.

3
Stage 218/10/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 19.11.2024.

4
Stage 311/09/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant and their counsel and adjourned the appeal to 18.10.2024 for orders or hearing.

5
Stage 414/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted a change in counsel for the appellant and adjourned the matter to 11.09.2024 for orders or hearing.

6
Stage 516/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and rescheduled the appeal for a hearing on 14.08.2024.

7
Stage 616/05/2024

Hearing

No text available.

8
Stage 716/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and adjourned the appeal to be listed for hearing/orders on 16.05.2024.

9
Stage 813/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant a final one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and adjourned the matter to 16.04.2024.

10
Stage 907/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 13.03.2024.

11
Stage 1008/11/2023

Hearing

No text available.

12
Stage 1125/09/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for orders or hearing on November 8, 2023, noting that counsel for the respondent is on sanctioned leave.

13
Stage 1209/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from both parties and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 25.09.2023.

14
Stage 1329/05/2023

Hearing

Due to the absence of counsel for both parties, the Tribunal adjourned the case and scheduled it for hearing/orders on 09.08.2023.

15
Stage 1418/04/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from both parties and rescheduled the hearing for May 29, 2023.

16
Stage 1503/03/2023

For Order

The tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of both parties and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 18.04.2023.

17
Stage 1601/02/2023

For Order

No text available.

18
Stage 1716/12/2022

For Order

The appeal was adjourned due to the absence of the appellant, with the matter rescheduled for further orders on 01.02.2023.

19
Stage 1823/11/2022

For Order

The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and listed the appeal for further orders on 16.12.2022.

20
Stage 1901/11/2022

For Order

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and ordered the case to be listed before Bench No. 1 on 23.11.2022 for further orders.

21
Stage 2023/09/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and extended the deadline for the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections by one week.

22
Stage 2125/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 23.09.2022.

23
Stage 2229/07/2022

Hearing

No text available.

24
Stage 2312/07/2022

Hearing

The proceedings were adjourned due to the health of the respondent's counsel, with the matter rescheduled for hearing on 29.07.2022.

25
Stage 2420/05/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulty and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 12.07.2022.

26
Stage 2528/04/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal has noted that pleadings are complete and, upon the joint request of both counsels, has ordered the appeal to be listed for a future hearing date.

27
Stage 2616/03/2022

to file objections and its reply

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 28.04.2022.

28
Stage 2728/02/2022

to file objections and its reply

No text available.

29
Stage 2805/01/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 18.01.2022.

30
Stage 2910/12/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent and rescheduled the case for further orders on January 5, 2022.

31
Stage 3010/11/2021

Hearing

No text available.

32
Stage 3118/10/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant two weeks to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for November 10, 2021.

33
Stage 3222/09/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Motu orders regarding the extension of limitation periods due to COVID-19, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

34
Stage 3303/05/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

35
Stage 3409/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

36
Stage 3508/03/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notices to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to exchange applications, objections, and replies within specified timelines before the next hearing on 09.04.2021.

37
Stage 36Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126007452021-22-09-2021

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Motu orders regarding the extension of limitation periods due to COVID-19, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

Dismissed Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

Dismissed

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Lokesh Mishra

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Inderpreet Singh Chaddha

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126007452021-22-09-2021

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Motu orders regarding the extension of limitation periods due to COVID-19, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for royal hometown planners pvt ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →