up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126006352020

Appellant / Complainant

Rajesh Nigam

VS

Respondent

Jaiprakash Associates Ltd

Developer Firm

jaiprakash associates ltd

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

14 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126006352020 by Rajesh Nigam against Jaiprakash Associates Ltd before up_rera.

2
Stage 124/12/2021

Hearing

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to provide sufficient cause or a valid explanation for filing the appeal beyond the prescribed limitation period.

3
Stage 208/12/2021

Final Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant an additional week to file an application for condonation of delay and directed both parties to upload their pleadings to the e-portal before the next hearing on 24.12.2021.

4
Stage 326/11/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal reasons and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.

5
Stage 428/10/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal rejected the current limitation application due to ambiguity regarding the impugned order's dates and directed the applicant to file a fresh, detailed application with copies served to the respondent.

6
Stage 528/09/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the exchange of documents via email. The case is scheduled for hearing on 28.10.2021 regarding the application for condonation of delay.

7
Stage 615/04/2021

Delay condonation

No text available.

8
Stage 722/03/2021

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent deadline for the appellant's reply.

9
Stage 823/02/2021

Defect Removal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed the parties to exchange applications for condonation of delay and objections via email before the next hearing on 22.03.2021.

10
Stage 912/02/2021

Defect Removal

The Tribunal directed the Registry to verify the removal of defects reported by the appellant and scheduled the matter for a subsequent hearing on 23.02.2021.

11
Stage 1002/02/2021

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to rectify registry defects and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 12.02.2021.

12
Stage 1125/01/2021

Defect Removal

No text available.

13
Stage 12Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126006352020-24-12-2021

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to provide sufficient cause or a valid explanation for filing the appeal beyond the prescribed limitation period.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to provide sufficient cause or a valid explanation for filing the appeal beyond the prescribed limitation period. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to provide sufficient cause or a valid explanation for filing the appeal beyond the prescribed limitation period.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Kundan Rai
  • S.S. Rajawat

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Altaf Mansoor
  • Nitin Kapoor
  • Tanay Chaudhary

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126006352020-24-12-2021

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to provide sufficient cause or a valid explanation for filing the appeal beyond the prescribed limitation period.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for jaiprakash associates ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →