Appellant / Complainant
Sunita
Respondent
Uttar Pradesh Avas evam Vikas Parishad
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126006202021 by Sunita against Uttar Pradesh Avas evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of 911 days due to a failure to show sufficient cause, subsequently dismissing the appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the case for hearing and consideration of an application for condonation of delay on 20.10.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the hearing for the application for condonation of delay to 18.10.2022 due to heavy rain and the absence of the appellant, noting that the matter will proceed based on available records if no one appears on the next date.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the matter for 10.10.2022 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and the lack of any request for adjournment.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the applicant's counsel due to illness and scheduled the matter for April 19, 2022, to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to prepare for arguments regarding the application for condonation of delay and rescheduled the hearing to 05.04.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed that the reply be emailed to the respondent and uploaded to the e-portal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal listed the defective appeal for 25.01.2022 to address the disposal of the limitation application and any related objections.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the appellant's counsel and directed the filing of a reply to the respondent's objections before the next hearing on 04.01.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant two weeks to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for December 16, 2021, to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to complete necessary formalities and stamp duties for possession, while ordering the respondent to provide the Occupation/Completion Certificate and hand over lawful possession of the flat.
For Order
The case is adjourned due to the absence of counsel for U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and is scheduled for further orders on 05.10.2021.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry defects within 10 days and ordered that notice be issued to the respondent via registered post and email.
Tribunal Order #0901126006202021-20-10-2022
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of 911 days due to a failure to show sufficient cause, subsequently dismissing the appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126006202021-19-04-2022
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and the lack of any request for adjournment.
Tribunal Order #0901126006202021-05-10-2021
The Tribunal directed the appellant to complete necessary formalities and stamp duties for possession, while ordering the respondent to provide the Occupation/Completion Certificate and hand over lawful possession of the flat.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of 911 days due to a failure to show sufficient cause, subsequently dismissing the appeal. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of 911 days due to a failure to show sufficient cause, subsequently dismissing the appeal.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Applicant/Appellant In-Person
- Mohd. Zafar Khan
Respondent Advocate(s)
- N N Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of 911 days due to a failure to show sufficient cause, subsequently dismissing the appeal.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and the lack of any request for adjournment.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to complete necessary formalities and stamp duties for possession, while ordering the respondent to provide the Occupation/Completion Certificate and hand over lawful possession of the flat.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.