Appellant / Complainant
Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Sheetal Kataria
uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126006152024 by Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Sheetal Kataria before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the applications for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed all six appeals; consequently, it directed the transfer of the appellants' pre-deposited amounts to the U.P. RERA for distribution to the allottees.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the absence of the Appellant's counsel and scheduled a hearing for May 29, 2024, to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126006152024-29-05-2024
The Tribunal rejected the applications for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed all six appeals; consequently, it directed the transfer of the appellants' pre-deposited amounts to the U.P. RERA for distribution to the allottees.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the applications for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed all six appeals; consequently, it directed the transfer of the appellants' pre-deposited amounts to the U.P. RERA for distribution to the allottees. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the applications for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed all six appeals; consequently, it directed the transfer of the appellants' pre-deposited amounts to the U.P. RERA for distribution to the allottees.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
from 01.05.2016 till date of receipt of OC/CC or to the date when possession of plot was offered whichever is later
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Naveen Kumar Tiwari
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal rejected the applications for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed all six appeals; consequently, it directed the transfer of the appellants' pre-deposited amounts to the U.P. RERA for distribution to the allottees.
Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.