Appellant / Complainant
Sunil Prasad Singh
Respondent
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Limited
ansal properties & infrastructure limited
₹32,05,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126004252022 by Sunil Prasad Singh against Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Limited before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal against a dismissal for non-prosecution, ruling that the appellant's failure to attend multiple virtual hearings due to illness or technical issues demonstrated a lack of seriousness and did not justify setting aside the original order.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a final 10-day extension to the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for May 11, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant two weeks to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for 22.04.2022 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal within two weeks, with a subsequent deadline for the appellant's reply.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry defects and issued notice to the respondent, scheduling the matter for 08.03.2022 to address the issue of limitation.
Tribunal Order #0901126004252022-11-05-2022
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal against a dismissal for non-prosecution, ruling that the appellant's failure to attend multiple virtual hearings due to illness or technical issues demonstrated a lack of seriousness and did not justify setting aside the original order.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal against a dismissal for non-prosecution, ruling that the appellant's failure to attend multiple virtual hearings due to illness or technical issues demonstrated a lack of seriousness and did not justify setting aside the original order. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal against a dismissal for non-prosecution, ruling that the appellant's failure to attend multiple virtual hearings due to illness or technical issues demonstrated a lack of seriousness and did not justify setting aside the original order.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Sanjay Awasthi
- Al Aisha
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
- Krishna Kumar Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal against a dismissal for non-prosecution, ruling that the appellant's failure to attend multiple virtual hearings due to illness or technical issues demonstrated a lack of seriousness and did not justify setting aside the original order.
Need to research all rulings for ansal properties & infrastructure limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.