Appellant / Complainant
Amit Mittal
Respondent
J.S.S. Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
j.s.s. buildcon pvt. ltd.
₹20,00,000
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126004052019 by Amit Mittal against J.S.S. Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the RERA's order dated 27.05.2019, ruling that it violated principles of natural justice by relying on an unserved reply without allowing the appellant to file a replication, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal took on record additional documents (receipts and bank statements) provided by the respondent and reserved the judgment following arguments regarding whether the appellant was properly served with the respondent's written statement during RERA proceedings.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file an original document via affidavit and granted the appellant three days to file a reply to objections, noting that the case is scheduled for final hearing on 20.11.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 15.11.2021 upon a joint request from both parties' counsels and noted the payment of remaining costs of Rs. 2,000 by the respondent's counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to deposit unpaid costs of Rs. 5000/- and to produce an original document (Paper No.11) for forgery verification, warning that failure to comply will result in adverse inferences being drawn against the builder.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce the original undated document (Paper No. 11) for verification and ordered the respondent to pay Rs. 5,000/- in costs to the appellant.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to the absence of parties during the scheduled hearing and rescheduled the matter for 01.10.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the Registry to summon case records from the Regulatory Authority and ordered the respondent to deposit a previously imposed cost of Rs. 5,000/- before the next hearing.
For Order
The case was adjourned because lawyers were abstaining from work due to a call by the Oudh Bar Association; the defective appeal is rescheduled for 15.03.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file their vakalatnama and reply to the grounds of appeal within specified timelines and scheduled the next hearing for March 1, 2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126004052019-07-10-2021
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to deposit unpaid costs of Rs. 5000/- and to produce an original document (Paper No.11) for forgery verification, warning that failure to comply will result in adverse inferences being drawn against the builder.
Tribunal Order #0901126004052019-01-10-2021
The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce the original undated document (Paper No. 11) for verification and ordered the respondent to pay Rs. 5,000/- in costs to the appellant.
Tribunal Order #0901126004052019-21-03-2022
The Tribunal set aside the RERA's order dated 27.05.2019, ruling that it violated principles of natural justice by relying on an unserved reply without allowing the appellant to file a replication, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Tribunal Order #0901126004052019-15-03-2021
The Tribunal directed the Registry to summon case records from the Regulatory Authority and ordered the respondent to deposit a previously imposed cost of Rs. 5,000/- before the next hearing.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the RERA's order dated 27.05.2019, ruling that it violated principles of natural justice by relying on an unserved reply without allowing the appellant to file a replication, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: 18%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the RERA's order dated 27.05.2019, ruling that it violated principles of natural justice by relying on an unserved reply without allowing the appellant to file a replication, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
18%
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Saghar Mehdi
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Sushil Kumar
- Siddharth Nandwani
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to deposit unpaid costs of Rs. 5000/- and to produce an original document (Paper No.11) for forgery verification, warning that failure to comply will result in adverse inferences being drawn against the builder.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to produce the original undated document (Paper No. 11) for verification and ordered the respondent to pay Rs. 5,000/- in costs to the appellant.
The Tribunal set aside the RERA's order dated 27.05.2019, ruling that it violated principles of natural justice by relying on an unserved reply without allowing the appellant to file a replication, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
The Tribunal directed the Registry to summon case records from the Regulatory Authority and ordered the respondent to deposit a previously imposed cost of Rs. 5,000/- before the next hearing.
Need to research all rulings for j.s.s. buildcon pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.