up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126003952022

Appellant / Complainant

Punit Kumar

VS

Respondent

Shinecity Shapers Private Limited, Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Developer Firm

shinecity shapers private limited

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Jurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

6 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003952022 by Punit Kumar against Shinecity Shapers Private Limited, Real Estate Regulatory Authority before up_rera.

Jurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 106/05/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project is not registered with U.P. RERA, rendering the Act and the Tribunal's jurisdiction inapplicable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

3
Stage 207/04/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued fresh notice to the respondent and provided specific procedural instructions for the applicant regarding service of documents and filing an application for condonation of delay.

4
Stage 315/02/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry defects and issued notice to the respondent, scheduling the next hearing for April 7, 2022, to address the issue of limitation.

5
Stage 4Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126003952022-06-05-2022

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project is not registered with U.P. RERA, rendering the Act and the Tribunal's jurisdiction inapplicable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project is not registered with U.P. RERA, rendering the Act and the Tribunal's jurisdiction inapplicable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project is not registered with U.P. RERA, rendering the Act and the Tribunal's jurisdiction inapplicable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Jagdamba Prasad Mishra

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126003952022-06-05-2022

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the respondent's project is not registered with U.P. RERA, rendering the Act and the Tribunal's jurisdiction inapplicable under the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S Newtech Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for shinecity shapers private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →